Lawrence Krauss forfeits to William Lane Craig in debate

Lawrence Krauss refuses to engage with the topic/question of the debate and when pressed on it changes the question altogether. I only put in the parts of the video where the debate topic becomes relevant, which from the length you can see was seldom. You can watch the entire debate here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V82uGzgoajI Krauss was clearly not prepared to answer Leibniz argument and throughout the dialouge mainly wanted to talk about science, despite the topic being a meta-physical question. It's unfortunate how little was said about the actual topic, but this is essentially the debate if only taking the debate question into relevance. I'll also cover the other two dialouges eventually, especially if this video is successful. I don't think many viewers actually caught this blunder so I hope it helps elicit the philosophical vacancy of Professor Krauss for those who follow his debates. He's a great scientist in his field but is utterly out of his depth in this type of philosophical arena. This was the 2nd of a 3-part discussion between the two in Sydney, Australia