False Jews: Edomites & European Converts
In the time of Nebuchadnezzar II the Edomites may have helped plunder Jerusalem and slaughter the Judaeans in 587 or 586 BCE (Psalms 137:7; Obadiah 1:11–14). Some believe that it is for this reason the prophets denounced Edom (Isaiah 34:5–8; Jeremiah 49:7–22; Obadiah passim).
Evidence also suggests that at that time Edom may have engaged in a treaty betrayal of Judah.[48] The people of Edom would be dealt with during the Messiah's rulership, according to the prophets.
Regarding the territory of Edom, the book of Jeremiah states that "no one will live there, nor will anyone of mankind reside in it"
The world can not for very much longer deny the true identity of the Biblical Israelites. Excavated archeology, unbiased and unadulterated history, various confessions from Israeli’s, Arabs, Egyptians, and Europeans, and last but not least Biblical prophecy all clearly and without doubt, reveals that the true, historic, Biblical Israelites, are a black people that have been scattered into slavery and cursed by God.
God told the nation of Israel that one of their many curses for disobedience would be that he would cause their “identity to cease from among men” (Deuteronomy 32).
This lost of identity culminated around 70 A.D. when Titus besieged Jerusalem and the hebrews of the land were either killed or displaced into Africa before being dispersed into all nations (via the slave trades) as prophesied by Jesus in Luke 21:24.
Israel’s captivity and lost of identity paved the way for another group of people to steal and appropriate the identity of the true, black Israelites that have been scattered into captivity and cursed by God.
This treacherous and abominable event is why the world does not know who the true Israelites are.
Thankfully, nothing can be hidden from God and since he has told the end from the beginning, he has revealed, uncovered, and exposed the perpetrators of his chosen people all throughout the Bible and History.
Let us look at the words of Jesus himself, to prove this:
Revelation 2:9
King James Version (KJV)
9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Revelation 3:9
King James Version (KJV)
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
It is clear that there are a group of people purporting to be the Biblical, original Jews, when in reality, they are not. Since we are dealing with identity, it is imperative that we examine history to assist us in unveiling who these purporting Jews really are. There are two main branches of lying “Jews” in the world today:
1) Edomites (Jacob’s twin brother) – a SEMITIC (non-European) group of people who stole Jacob’s (Israel) identity as prophesied in the Bible.
2) Ashkenazi Jews/Khazars – a group of Europeans who converted to Judaism (not Esau).
In 1982, Ella J. Hughley wrote a book called “The Truth About Black Biblical Hebrew-Israelites Jews: the Worlds Best Kept Secret.” Hughley’s chapter, “The White European Jews” was compelling and thought provoking as it aimed at answering questions such as:
1) Who are the White European Jews?
2) When did they convert to Judaism?
3) Are the “Jews” a race?
These questions are of utmost importance. Hughley writes, “Esau is the father of the white (in color but not in nationality) Edomites, also known as Idumeans, who, with other ethnic groups such as the Khazars (white Europeans/Caucasians) and others, make up modern Jewry as it is known today” (p. 35). “Khazars” are Southern Turkish Europeans who came into Israel after the Israelites were kicked out.
Hugely is not alone in her findings. The Hungarian-British author and journalist, Arthur Koestler published a book entitled, “The Thirteenth Tribe” in 1976. Koestler argued that the Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of the Khazars rather than biblical Israelites. Hughley references Koestler in this chapter.
In 2008, Israeli professor of History at Tel Aviv University, Shlomo Sand published “The Invention of the Jewish People”. Originally in Hebrew, his work (2008) proved that people commonly known as Jewish, never really existed as a ‘nation-race’ with a biblical origin, but rather they consist of descendants from the medieval Eurasian state of Khazaria.
He mentions how they adopted the customs known as Judaism today. Genesis 10, commonly known as the “Table of Nations”, traces the lineage of the European converts to Noah’s son, Japheth whose descendants are commonly referred to as “Gentiles” in the bible but by historians as the “Indo-European stock”.
As for the Khazar’s conversion, “The Khazars (white Europeans/Japhetic in origins) converted to Judaism in 740 A.D. According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, (Vol. V, (1904), p 41), the Khazars are “A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews in Russia . . . Historical evidence points to the region of the Urals as the home of the Chazars”.
Ashkenazi Jewish author and historian, the late Arthur Koestler agrees that the large majority of Jews are of Khazar and not Semitic origin. “That their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan, but from the Caucasus; . . . and that genetically they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob”.
Historian H.G. Wells states, “. . . the Idumeans (Edomites) were . . . made Jews, . . . and a Turkish people (Khazars) were mainly Jews in South Russia . . . The main part of Jewry never was in Judea and had never come out of Judea” (The Outline of History, 3rd Edition., p 494).
Esau is not “The White Man” aka European
Jacob-Esau-Resized
It is important to note that contrary to popular belief the Ashkenazi/Khazar’s are GENTILES and are NOT EDOM/ESAU like many tend to believe. It is also important to understand that ESAU (not the European convert jews) are the the current day ISRAELI’S and are responsible for stealing Israel’s identity.
Esau is a descendant from Isaac and twin brother of Jacob in Genesis 25, which makes him Semitic.
The White Man (Gentiles) comes from Japheth in Genesis 10
This is one of the reasons why people call Esau, the White Man:
In Hebrew, the word Ashkenazi means “German” and the term is used for Jews of Eastern European origin who historically spoke the Yiddish or Judeo-German language. Arthur Koestler’s “Thirteenth Tribe” narrative motivated a few biologists like Dr. Eran Elhaik to likewise claim that contemporary Jews are Khazars, not the Israelite descendants of Abraham and Sarah. (Hitler’s Doubles, Peter Fotis Kapnistos, p. 157)
However, you don’t have to make Esau out to be Gentiles to prove that they are not Israelites. When we understand the Bible we realize that people are not “mixed” or “bi-racial”, rather we are all simply whatever nationality our Father is. Like Timothy was a Greek even tho his mother was a Jew which is just like Bob Marley who was a Gentile because his father was a white man even tho his mother was black.
Therefore, we should not get caught up on color. This whole thing is not about color, it is about nationality. Color does not mean anything because genetically speaking, Israel – a dark skinned people are more closely linked to Esau who is considered “red” than to Hamites (Africans) who are also dark skinned.
Furthermore, the Edomites and Gentiles understand that they are not the same group of people. Thus, it is only misinformed people that confuse the two groups. That is why the Edomites will label white people as anti-semitic and call them racist slurs like honkey’s and that is why many white Nationalists are anti-Jewish and are apart of controversial organizations such as the American Nazi party.
The below article – DNA Samples Confirm Ashkenazi Jews are from European Descent” shows us that Ashkenazi Jews maternal/mother lineage comes from Europe. But they are of Edom descendants because you are what you father is, therefore they are not Gentiles.
When Edom disappeared from history around 70 AD the Edomites migrated to Europe. It is only around 1948 that many of them moved into the state of Israel which was created by the “White Men” of Britain and the United Nations.
So if the false theory of the Jews being mostly Khazar or Ashkenazi (Gentiles) is true, then you should ask yourself, where are the Edomites? Because the Lord said that the Edomites are the ones that occupy the Promised Land.
Jeremiah 49:10
King James Version (KJV)
10 But I have made Esau bare, I have uncovered his secret places, and he shall not be able to hide himself: his seed is spoiled, and his brethren, and his neighbours, and he is not.
This article from the Science World Report shows the migration of the Edomites and how they travelled into Europe and took wives from the Europeans which is also another reason why they look similar to Europeans even tho they are not Europeans.
Now that we know who the European Jews mainly consist of, let us turn to the main perpetrators of Israel’s identity, the Israeli’s that call themselves Jews and do lie, are none other than Jacob’s semitic twin brother, Esau/Edom aka Idumeans.
To understand this appropriation in its totality we must refer back to the prophets of the Bible and the history of Jacob and Esau as recorded in Genesis 25-27.
While pregnant, the God of Israel told their mother Rebekah that she had two separate nations (one would be black and the other red and hairy) in her womb and that the Elder would serve the younger. Edom (the elder) ended up selling his birthright to Jacob for some red pottage.
Many theologians and writers on this topic erroneously infer that Jacob stole Esau’s birthright. However, this is a false assertion that is cleared up with the scriptures.
It is very clear that enmity existed between these two brothers while they were in the womb (Genesis 25:22-23). More importantly, Jacob did not steal Esau’s birthright as it is explicitly recorded twice in the bible that Esau sold his birthright to Jacob in Genesis 25:31-33 and Hebrews 12:16.
We do not read that Jacob stole Esau’s birthright, we read that Esau sold his birthright to Jacob.
Yet, even after he sold his birthright/blessing, he still tried to receive the blessing from Isaac that went to Jacob which shows his cunningness.
Even though Esau did not receive his birthright he did receive another blessing from Isaac which included him inheriting the fatness (or wealth) of the earth, which is why they are known to be inherently wealthy, bankers, financiers, money changers, and control many of the wealthiest Western industries such as Hollywood.
Jacob (the younger), ended up receiving the birthright which included his name being changed to Israel (Genesis 32:24-28), inheriting the land of Canaan (Exodus 3:6-10), and being commissioned as a holy nation of priests and kings to all kindred’s and tongues (Exodus 19:5-6).
They entered into a covenant with God and God promised that if they would obey Him and keep his commandments that their land, sustenance, children, and all that they owned and did would be blessed (Deuteronomy 28:1-14).
However, if they were to disobey God and break his commandments then he would curse their entire nation with affliction, oppression, and disease, remove them from the Promised Land and scatter them into slavery throughout the world by way of slave ships (Deuteronomy 28:15-68). Unfortunately for the nation of Israel, they choose to rebel against God and break his commandments.
Therefore, he put them under the divine curse that he forewarned them of (Daniel 9). The curses of Israel which include deplorable socio-economic conditions in slavery as well as their physical description proves that the Edomites or the one’s claiming to be Jews today are not the Biblical Israelites.
The Edomites took advantage of their brother’s destruction and since they have always thought that they deserved the birthright which they sold, they used this opportunity to appropriate Jacob’s land, heritage and identity.
13243945_1623870251267821_4745319374872364484_o
There is a great deal of historic sources that explain the gradual process of how the Edomites converted to what is known as Judaism, occupied the land of Israel, and eventually became known as the biblical Israelites.
For the Edomites, this process started as early as the 6th century B.C.E. as a result of forced migration by the hands of the Nabateans (who are reported a Northern Arabian tribe).
They were driven out of their own land commonly known as Idumea and inhabited Southern Judea. How were they able to occupy Southern Judah? God had foretold that the Israelites would be taken into captivity by the Babylonians for 70 years (Jeremiah 25:3-12).
During this time, the Edomites were forced out of their land by the Nabateans and started to settle in Southern Judah. Eventually, Cyrus, the king of Persia, proclaims an edict that allows Israel to go back into Judah and rebuild the third temple after their 70 year captivity in Babylon (Ezra 1:1-3).
When Israel returned to Judah after their 70 year captivity, they were cut of from Hebron because the Edomites had established themselves there. This was the beginning of their identity theft.
Atlas of the Bible, p. 148 – The Return :
“At some point, but no later than 522BC, a second great group of Babylonian Jews came to Jerusalem and then settled, each to his own town. The list of these towns in Ezra 2:2-35 and Nehemiah 7:6-38, indicate that the returning of Jews, established themselves in an area, roughly 40 miles east to west by 30 miles north to south in the hill country of Judah. On the east, they extended to the Jordan valley around Jericho, while to the west, they penetrated the coastal plain, settling in Lod and Ono. To the North, they reached beyond the old border of Judah to Bethel. In the South, they held strategic sites of Beth-Zur, but were cut off from Hebron, which was in the hands of the Edomites. Although the area was small, the Jews controlled vital approaches to the highlands. Yet, they could not be secure until Jerusalem, the leading city and place of ultimate refuge was refortified.”
The Sarcophagus of an Ancient Civilization: Petra, Edom, and the Edomites (Idumeans) p. 369-370 – History of the Idumeans.:
“Judea and Idumea, (Sir) George Adam Smith (theologian and historian) made Idumea of that time, to include the southern shepolah, with the Negev. Adding that the Edomites had come upon it during the Jewish exile and after the return of the Jews, they continued to hold the greater part of it. Whatever the extent of Idumea originally may have been, it is certain that when the sons of Esau came into Palestine in the 6th century BC, they settled in close juxtaposition and stood face to face with their age old brothers and rivals, the sons of Jacob. Whether Cyrus in 536 BC dislodged them from certain parts of Judah in order to give the returning exiles of Israel a foothold, we do not know.
But it is more likely as Ewald observed three quarters of a century ago, that this monarch was by no means prepared to expel the Idumeans from the land which they had already occupied and cultivated for 50 or 60 years. On the other hand, the prophet Malachi points to them as the object of Jehovah’s displeasure in his day as a people; “Against whom Jehovah had indication forever, Saying Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated”. By which He probably meant that the Israelites have already been brought back from captivity but the Edomites are still in exile, having been expelled by the Nabateans. During all of the centuries of their occupation of Judah, the Jews regarded them with suspicion.
Their unbrotherly treatment of them on the occasion of Jerusalem’s downfall in 586 BC was never forgotten. In 164 BC, Judas Maccabee’s fought them with triumphant success. Less than 50 years thereafter, John Hyrcanus completely conquered them, not only wrestling from them two of their most powerful strongholds, Adorah and Maresha, and placing them under a Jewish governor, but compelling them also to submit to circumcision and the Jewish law.”
In an article on “Edom”, the Jewish Encyclopdia (1925 edition), has this statement: ”(In 163BC) Judas Maccabeus conquered their territory for a time. They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (about 125 BC), by whom they were forced to observe Jewish rites and laws.
They were then incorporated with the Jewish nation, and their country was called by the Greeks and Romans, “Idumea.” With Antipater began the Idumean dynasty that ruled over Judea till its conquest by the Romans . . . From this time the Idumeans ceased to be a separate people . . .”
So a hundred years before Christ, Judah was inhabited by Edomites and native Israelites who were both followers of Talmudic Judaism, seeming to heal the breach between Jacob and Esau. But the Edomites proved to be a discordant element. And in 37BC, Herod the Great (74-4BC), an Idumean or Edomite whose wife Mariamne was a Maccabean, became at the age of 36, undisputed ruler of Judea.
The Pharisees gained ascendancy over the Sadducees, and there were so many Edomites in the population at the time of Christ that the land was called Idumea (Mark 3:8). The Edomites participated in the defence of Jerusalem against the Romans during Titus’ siege (AD66-70).
According to The Jewish Encyclopedia (1904, Vol. V, p 41), “Immediately before the siege of Jerusalem 20,000 Idumeans appeared before Jerusalem to fight in behalf of the Zealots who were besieged in the Temple”. More than a million inhabitants of Judea died and 97,000 were taken captive. An unknown number had fled either before or during the siege.
Drawing on the record of Flavius Josephus’ The Great Roman Jewish War: 70 A.D. we are informed that Hasmonean leader, John Hyracanus conquered the entire land of Edom “and undertook the forced conversion of its inhabitants to Judaism”.
This is when the Edomites became a section of the Jewish people. Josephus also points out that the tyrannical king Herod was in fact an Edomite who was appointed king of Judea by the Romans in 40 B.C.E. and by 6 B.C.E., “Edom became part of the Roman province of Judea” (p. 43-44).
they left black
In 70 A.D., they assisted the Romans to help Emperor Titus besiege Jerusalem, and as a result many Israelites were crucified, starved, and to escape persecution almost all of the Jews fled into North Africa.
Luke 21:20-24
King James Version (KJV)
20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.
21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.
22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
23 But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.
24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
Arch_of_Titus_Menorah
The last Two Million Years, pg. 87 – Faith survives the dispersion:
“The crucifixion of Jesus about AD 30 did not end Jewish resistance to the Roman occupation. In 70, when the country was again in a state of revolt, Jerusalem, the holy city, became the core of resistance to the Romans. Titus, the son of Emperor Vespasian preceded to lay siege to Jerusalem. The city fall and the inhabitants were enslaved in their thousands and dispersed throughout the Mediterranean world. This was the first dispersion and worse was yet to follow. Continual insurrections and revolts again Roman rule led to the total destruction of Jerusalem in 135. The city was renamed Aelia Capitolina and all Jews were prohibited from entering it. A second and more important dispersion not took place and the whole of Judea was renamed, Palestine.”
Once the Roman siege and occupation of Israel took place – in which the Edomites helped to achieve – they were able to completely inhabit the land of Israel.
Obadiah 1-3, 8-15
King James Version (KJV)
1 The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord God concerning Edom; We have heard a rumour from the Lord, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle.
2 Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: thou art greatly despised.
3 The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?
8 Shall I not in that day, saith the Lord, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?
9 And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter.
10 For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever.
11 In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them.
12 But thou shouldest not have looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stranger; neither shouldest thou have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day of their destruction; neither shouldest thou have spoken proudly in the day of distress.
13 Thou shouldest not have entered into the gate of my people in the day of their calamity; yea, thou shouldest not have looked on their affliction in the day of their calamity, nor have laid hands on their substance in the day of their calamity;
14 Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.
15 For the day of the Lord is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head.
Edom/Esau/Idumean disappears from Geography and History in 70 A.D. – The same year that Rome sieges Jerusalem and the Biblical Israelites go into captivity! This was able to take place because they moved into the land of Israel!
Zondervan Pictorial Bible Dictionary p. 233-234 – Edom:
“Edomites, the nation and its people who are descendants of Esau. He founded the country, so his name is equated with Edom. The country was also called Sier or Mount Sier, which was the name of the territory in which the Edomites lived. The mountain and the plateau area between the Dead Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba. About 100 miles long and up to 40 miles wide. The Edomites were also subject to Babylon. Under the Persian Empire, Edom became a province called Idumea, the Greek form of Edom. In 325 BC, an Arab tribe known as the Nabateans, conquered the Eastern part of Edom’s territory. In Maccabean times, John Hyrcanus subdued the Idumeans and forced them to accept Judaism. When the Romans took over Palestine, the Edomites also were included. From Idumea came Antipater, the Father of Herod the Great. He became pro-curator of Judea. After the destruction of Jerusalem, by the Romans, in 70 AD, the Idumeans disappeared from history.
Map of Southern Levant c830 BCE – Edom is on the map, south of the Kingdom of Judah.
Map_of_the_Levant
First Century Map of Judea – Idumea was still on the map.
A_history_of_the_Jewish_people_during_the_Maccabean_and_Roman_periods_(including_New_Testament_times)_(1900)_(14576629399)
World Scope Encyclopedia, Volume 5 & 6 – Edom
“Meaning Red, the name given to Esau on account of the red pottage secured by him by his brother Jacob. The name was also given to the country settled by Esau, having been previously known as Mount. Seir. It was about one hundred miles long and twenty miles wide, and was situated between the Dead Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba, in land from the Red Sea. Bozrah, now Busaira, situated in the extreme northern part, was the chief city and the capital. During the reigns of David and Solomon, Edom was under subjection to the Israelites. Later, the Edomites ravaged the southern borders of Palestine and were denounced with considerable vehemence, by some of the prophets of Israel. After the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, the name of Edom or Idumea disappeared from Geography.”
Palestine today (Idumea disappears off map)
maps-palestine-today
Edom was able to disappear from history after the Roman conquest of Jerusalem because the indigenous Israelites were subdued, removed from their land, and sent into slavery.
King David prophecies about the confederacy that Esau (Israeli’s) and Ishmael (Palestinians) conspired in order to distort the memory of Israel (they have done this because the masses do not know who the true Israelites are), remove them from their land, and take the land of Israel for their own possession.
Esau and Ishmael are rivals and the only time they have agreed was when they are working together to take Israel’s name out of existence.
Israelies-Puerta-Damasco-Jerusalen-AP_LNCIMA20130730_0033_3
Psalm 83:1-6
King James Version (KJV)
1 Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.
2 For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
3 They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:
6 The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes;
12 Who said, Let us take to ourselves the houses of God in possession.
blog14
God foretold that Edom (Mt. Sier) would possess the land of Israel and say that Israel and Judah belonged to them! This was fulfilled in 1982.
Ezekiel 35
King James Version (KJV)
35 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, set thy face against mount Seir, and prophesy against it,
3 And say unto it, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, O mount Seir, I am against thee, and I will stretch out mine hand against thee, and I will make thee most desolate.
4 I will lay thy cities waste, and thou shalt be desolate, and thou shalt know that I am the Lord.
5 Because thou hast had a perpetual hatred, and hast shed the blood of the children of Israel by the force of the sword in the time of their calamity, in the time that their iniquity had an end:
6 Therefore, as I live, saith the Lord God, I will prepare thee unto blood, and blood shall pursue thee: sith thou hast not hated blood, even blood shall pursue thee.
7 Thus will I make mount Seir most desolate, and cut off from it him that passeth out and him that returneth.
8 And I will fill his mountains with his slain men: in thy hills, and in thy valleys, and in all thy rivers, shall they fall that are slain with the sword.
9 I will make thee perpetual desolations, and thy cities shall not return: and ye shall know that I am the Lord.
10 Because thou hast said, These two nations and these two countries shall be mine, and we will possess it; whereas the Lord was there:
11 Therefore, as I live, saith the Lord God, I will even do according to thine anger, and according to thine envy which thou hast used out of thy hatred against them; and I will make myself known among them, when I have judged thee.
12 And thou shalt know that I am the Lord, and that I have heard all thy blasphemies which thou hast spoken against the mountains of Israel, saying, They are laid desolate, they are given us to consume.
13 Thus with your mouth ye have boasted against me, and have multiplied your words against me: I have heard them.
14 Thus saith the Lord God; When the whole earth rejoiceth, I will make thee desolate.
15 As thou didst rejoice at the inheritance of the house of Israel, because it was desolate, so will I do unto thee: thou shalt be desolate, O mount Seir, and all Idumea, even all of it: and they shall know that I am the Lord.
Menachem Begin
Sun Times Article, September 9th, 1982 – “West Bank forever vows Begin”:
“Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin vehemently rejected president Reagan’s Middle East peace initiative Wednesday, and declared that the occupied West Bank will be for the Jewish people for all generations. Pounding the podium for emphasis, Begin told the tumultuous session of the parliament, that Reagan’s plan was “unacceptable because it would endanger our lives, our homeland, the lands of our fathers, and sons”… “The world will witness whose dedication will win” Begin said, “if someone tried to take Judea and Samaria, the West Bank from us, we will tell him, Judea and Samaria for the Jewish people for all generations”.
This is why Jesus exposed the blasphemous Edomites who have appropriated the identity of the true Jews!!
Revelation 3:9
King James Version (KJV)
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
CONCLUSION:
The Edomites and Khazars, along with many other Indo-European ethnic groups, make up modern Jewery.
Christians and non-Christians need to realize that the people who are in the land of Israel today are not the Hebrews or Jews of the Bible and therefore, they should not be supported and more importantly they should not be followed spiritually because as seen above they are the synagogue of Satan which means that they are not worshipping God.
Although the black Hebrew-Israelites are the real descendants of ancient Israel and God’s chosen people that the world must follow for salvation, this truth is not known by many and it is the world’s best kept secret.
the kingship of Edom was, at least in early times, not hereditary, perhaps elective.
The first book of Chronicles mentions both a king and chieftains.
Moses and the Israelite people twice appealed to their common ancestry and asked the king of Edom for passage through his land, along the "King's Highway", on their way to Canaan, but the king refused permission.
Accordingly, they detoured around the country because of his show of force or because God ordered them to do so rather than wage war (Deuteronomy 2:4–6). The King of Edom did not attack the Israelites, though he prepared to resist aggression.
Nothing further is recorded of the Edomites in the Tanakh until their defeat by King Saul of Israel in the late 11th century BC (1 Samuel 14:47).
Forty years later King David and his general Joab defeated the Edomites in the "Valley of Salt" (probably near the Dead Sea; 2 Samuel 8:13–14; 1 Kings 9:15–16). An Edomite prince named Hadad escaped and fled to Egypt, and after David's death returned and tried to start a rebellion, but failed and went to Syria (Aramea).
From that time Edom remained a vassal of Israel.
David placed over the Edomites Israelite governors or prefects, and this form of government seems to have continued under Solomon.
When Israel divided into two kingdoms Edom became a dependency of the Kingdom of Judah. In the time of Jehoshaphat (c. 870 – 849 BC) the Tanakh mentions a king of Edom, who was probably an Israelite deputy appointed by the King of Judah. It also states that the inhabitants of Mount Seir invaded Judea in conjunction with Ammon and Moab, and that the invaders turned against one another and were all destroyed (2 Chronicles 20:10–23).
Edom revolted against Jehoram and elected a king of its own (2 Kings 8:20–22; 2 Chronicles 21:8).
Amaziah attacked and defeated the Edomites, seizing Selah, but the Israelites never subdued Edom completely (2 Kings 14:7; 2 Chronicles 25:11–12).
Costs of the 20-year war on terror: $8 trillion and 900,000 deaths
A report from the Costs of War project at Brown University revealed that 20 years of post-9/11 wars have cost the U.S. an estimated $8 trillion and have killed more than 900,000 people.
PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — Nearly 20 years after the United States’ invasion of Afghanistan, the cost of its global war on terror stands at $8 trillion and 900,000 deaths, according to a new report from the Costs of War project at Brown University.
The Costs of War project, founded more than a decade ago at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs and co-directed by two Brown scholars, released its influential annual report ahead of the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania, the impetus for an ongoing American effort to root out terrorism in the Middle East and beyond.
Stephanie Savell, Catherine Lutz and Neta CrawfordThe Costs of War project is co-directed by Stephanie Savell (left), Catherine Lutz (center) and Neta Crawford (right).
“The war has been long and complex and horrific and unsuccessful... and the war continues in over 80 countries,” said Catherine Lutz, co-director of Costs of War and a professor of international and public affairs at Brown, during a virtual event hosted by the Watson Institute on Wednesday, Sept. 1. “The Pentagon and the U.S. military have now absorbed the great majority of the federal discretionary budget, and most people don’t know that. Our task, now and in future years, is to educate the public on the ways in which we fund those wars and the scale of that funding.”
The research team’s $8 trillion estimate accounts for all direct costs of the country’s post-9/11 wars, including Department of Defense Overseas Contingency Operations funding; State Department war expenditures and counterterror war-related costs, including war-related increases to the Pentagon’s base budget; care for veterans to date and in the future; Department of Homeland Security spending; and interest payments on borrowing for these wars. The total includes funds that the Biden administration requested in May 2021.
The death toll, standing at an estimated 897,000 to 929,000, includes U.S. military members, allied fighters, opposition fighters, civilians, journalists and humanitarian aid workers who were killed as a direct result of war, whether by bombs, bullets or fire. It does not, the researchers noted, include the many indirect deaths the war on terror has caused by way of disease, displacement and loss of access to food or clean drinking water.
“The deaths we tallied are likely a vast undercount of the true toll these wars have taken on human life,” said Neta Crawford, a co-founder of the project and a professor of political science at Boston University. “It’s critical we properly account for the vast and varied consequences of the many U.S. wars and counterterror operations since 9/11, as we pause and reflect on all of the lives lost.”
“ Twenty years from now, we’ll still be reckoning with the high societal costs of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars — long after U.S. forces are gone. ”
Stephanie Savell Co-director, Costs of War project
The report comes at the end of a contentious U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, where Taliban insurgents captured every major city and seized governmental control as American military units worked to extract 123,000 troops, diplomats and allies. Of the $8 trillion, $2.3 trillion is attributed to the Afghanistan/Pakistan war zone, according to the report.
In an address to the nation on Tuesday, Aug. 31, President Joe Biden cited Costs of War estimates to convey the financial and human burden of the 20-year war in Afghanistan as he defended his decision to withdraw from the country.
“We no longer had a clear purpose in an open-ended mission in Afghanistan,” Biden said. “After more than $2 trillion spent in Afghanistan, costs that Brown University researchers estimated would be over $300 million a day for 20 years — yes, the American people should hear this... what have we lost as a consequence, in terms of opportunities? ...I refuse to send America’s sons and daughters to fight a war that should have ended long ago.”
Even as the U.S. exits Afghanistan, Costs of War estimates show that Americans are far from done paying the bill on the war on terror, which continues across multiple continents. The cumulative cost of military intervention in the Iraq/Syria war zone has risen to $2.1 trillion since 9/11, and about $355 billion more has funded military presence in other countries, including Somalia and a handful of African countries.
And when the wars do end, the costs of war will continue to rise, the report notes: A towering $2.2 trillion of the estimated financial total accounts for future care that has already been set aside for military veterans, the researchers said, and the U.S. and other countries could pay the cost of environmental damage wrought by the wars for generations to come.
“What have we truly accomplished in 20 years of post-9/11 wars and at what price?” said Stephanie Savell, co-director of the Costs of War Project and a senior research associate at the Watson Institute. “Twenty years from now, we’ll still be reckoning with the high societal costs of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars — long after U.S. forces are gone.”
The Watson Institute’s virtual event included commentary from multiple researchers associated with the Costs of War Project, U.S. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., and U.S. Reps. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., David Cicilline, D-R.I., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif. It was moderated by Murtaza Hussain, a national security reporter at the Intercept.
The terrorist attacks on the US on September 11, 2001, can be considered a watershed moment in the 21st Century. Its importance in defining the future course of global events is, perhaps, on par with the Russian revolution or the fall of Nazi Germany and atomic annihilation of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Two major wars, interventions by the US and NATO in numerous other countries, rise of new terror outfits and new geopolitical alliances and rivalries have marked the responses to 9/11 in the past 20 years.
In 2010, a group of scholars at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University in Rhode Island began work to chronicle the costs of the US interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan and related violence in Pakistan and Syria. The team, called 'The Costs of War Project', recently released figures of the costs incurred by the US and others in responding to 9/11.
The budgetary costs of the post-9/11 wars incurred by the US federal government was estimated by The Costs of War team to be over $8 trillion. Successive US governments, including the Joe Biden administration, have sought $5.8 trillion to react to the 9/11 attacks. This includes expenditure on war zones, homeland security and interest payments on war borrowing.
"The research team’s $8 trillion estimate accounts for all direct costs of the country’s post-9/11 wars, including Department of Defense Overseas Contingency Operations funding; State Department war expenditures and counterterror war-related costs, including war-related increases to the Pentagon’s base budget; care for veterans to date and in the future; Department of Homeland Security spending; and interest payments on borrowing for these wars," Brown University said in a statement.
Future medical care and disability payments for veterans would likely exceed $2.2 trillion, according to The Costs of War project, making for a figure of about $8 trillion in current dollars. The Costs of War project noted the figure of $8 trillion does not include the money spent on humanitarian assistance and development in Afghanistan and Iraq or expenditure by US allies.
Death toll
The Costs of War project notes the death toll in the wars after 9/11 is between 897,000 to 929,000 people. This includes "US military members, allied fighters, opposition fighters, civilians, journalists and humanitarian aid workers who were killed as a direct result of war, whether by bombs, bullets or fire".
also read
From Kochi to Ranchi, NIA avoids controversies over federal rights
'Cheap, small arms becoming weapon of choice of terror groups'
US kills top al-Qaeda leader Qasim al-Rimi in Yemen: Trump
Pakistan bans 11 groups for having links with JuD, JeM terror groups
A total of 7,052 US military personnel have died in the post-9/11 conflicts, with Iraq (4,598 deaths) and Afghanistan (2,324) accounting for the most fatalities. Highlighting the role played by private 'contractors' in the conflicts, a total of 8,189 contractors have lost their lives in these conflicts. Again, Afghanistan (3,917 deaths) and Iraq (3,650) account for the most fatalities.
Civilians account for the largest category of deaths. Civilian fatalities are estimated to be between 363,939 to 387,072, with Iraq accounting for approximately 208,964 deaths, the highest figure for a single country.
Refugees
The post-9/11 conflicts have led to around 38 million people being displaced. Since 2001, 5.9 million people have been displaced in Afghanistan and 3.7 million in Pakistan. Over 9 million people have been displaced in Iraq since 2003, while over 7.1 million have been displaced in Syria since 2014.
The Costs of War project states this figure exceeds people displaced in all conflicts since 1900, with the exception of the Second World War. The researchers caution the figure of 38 million is a "conservative" estimate, noting the the actual number could be closer to 49 million-60 million, rivalling the refugee numbers seen in the Second World War.
On September 10, 2001, then U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld disclosed that his department was unable to account for roughly $2.3 trillion worth of transactions. The next day, the U.S. sustained the terrorist attacks that changed the world, and this startling revelation was forgotten.
When an account discrepancy occurs that cannot be traced, it’s customary to make what is called an “un-documentable adjustment.” This is similar to when your checkbook balance is off by, say, ten dollars; you add or subtract that amount to make everything balance with the bank. In 1999, the amount that the Pentagon adjusted was eight times the Defense Department budget for that year; it was one-third greater than the entire federal budget.
By 2015, the amount reported missing by the Office of the Inspector General had increased to $6.5 trillion—and that was just for the army. Using public data from federal databases, Mark Skidmore, a professor of economics at Michigan State University, found that $21 trillion in unsupported adjustments had been reported by the Defense and Housing and Urban Development departments between 1998 and 2015. That’s about $65,000 for every American.
There is no sign that the government’s internal auditors have made much headway in finding the missing money. Jim Minnery of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service traveled the country in 2002 looking for documents on just $300 million worth of unrecorded spending. “We know it’s gone. But we don’t know what they spent it on,” he said. He was reassigned after suggesting that higher-ups covered up the problem by writing it off. He’s not the only who thinks so. “The books are cooked routinely year after year,” says former defense analyst Franklin C. Spinney.
According to a 2013 Reuters report, the Pentagon is the only federal agency that has not complied with a 1996 law that requires annual audits of all government departments. The Pentagon has spent tens of billions of dollars to upgrade to more efficient technology in order to become audit-ready. But many of these new systems have failed and been scrapped.
Predictably, the government did not race to correct the problem even after investigators sounded the alarm. Skidmore contacted the Office of the Inspector General but was not permitted to speak to anyone who had worked on the corruption report. Both the Congressional Budget Office and the Government Accountability Office assured him that congressional hearings would have been held if there was a significant problem. When Rumsfeld eventually did appear before Congress in March 2005, his testimony offered no substantive answers.
In short: the military doesn’t know how its budget is being spent. The “total military expenditures” that analysts so confidently cite are whatever the Treasury Department says they are, and the individual line items, at least for the army, are for the most part unknown. If money is being diverted from the armed forces, the losses are degrading our defense capability in ways difficult to observe. The same is true on a smaller scale for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, where billions in missing expenditures could have gone to support the perennially cash-strapped federal mortgage-loan program, and possibly other unrelated programs, without congressional knowledge or approval.
Though each passing year diminishes the likelihood that already-disbursed funds will be tracked down, Americans should insist on a renewed effort to rein in future discrepancies. The Trump presidency presents a fresh chance to prioritize accountability, and the president campaigned on robust military spending and reducing government waste. With congressional cooperation, the president should ask the secretaries of the Departments of Defense and of Housing and Urban Development to testify about any misplaced spending, and commission new independent audits of their expenses. This ongoing mismanagement of the public trust—and public dollars—is possibly the greatest silent scandal in America today.
If it were measured as a country, then cybercrime — which is predicted to inflict damages totaling $6 trillion USD globally in 2021 — would be the world’s third-largest economy after the U.S. and China.
Cybersecurity Ventures expects global cybercrime costs to grow by 15 percent per year over the next five years, reaching $10.5 trillion USD annually by 2025, up from $3 trillion USD in 2015. This represents the greatest transfer of economic wealth in history, risks the incentives for innovation and investment, is exponentially larger than the damage inflicted from natural disasters in a year, and will be more profitable than the global trade of all major illegal drugs combined.
The damage cost estimation is based on historical cybercrime figures including recent year-over-year growth, a dramatic increase in hostile nation-state sponsored and organized crime gang hacking activities, and a cyberattack surface which will be an order of magnitude greater in 2025 than it is today.
Cybercrime costs include damage and destruction of data, stolen money, lost productivity, theft of intellectual property, theft of personal and financial data, embezzlement, fraud, post-attack disruption to the normal course of business, forensic investigation, restoration and deletion of hacked data and systems, and reputational harm.
The United States, the world’s largest economy with a nominal GDP of nearly $21.5 trillion, constitutes one-fourth of the world economy, according to data from Nasdaq.
Cybercrime has hit the U.S. so hard that in 2018 a supervisory special agent with the FBI who investigates cyber intrusions told The Wall Street Journal that every American citizen should expect that all of their data (personally identifiable information) has been stolen and is on the dark web — a part of the deep web — which is intentionally hidden and used to conceal and promote heinous activities. Some estimates put the size of the deep web (which is not indexed or accessible by search engines) at as much as 5,000 times larger than the surface web, and growing at a rate that defies quantification.
The dark web is also where cybercriminals buy and sell malware, exploit kits, and cyberattack services, which they use to strike victims — including businesses, governments, utilities, and essential service providers on U.S. soil.
A cyberattack could potentially disable the economy of a city, state or our entire country.
In his 2016 New York Times bestseller — Lights Out: A Cyberattack, A Nation Unprepared, Surviving the Aftermath — Ted Koppel reveals that a major cyberattack on America’s power grid is not only possible but likely, that it would be devastating, and that the U.S. is shockingly unprepared.
Billionaire businessman and philanthropist Warren Buffet calls cybercrime the number one problem with mankind, and cyberattacks a bigger threat to humanity than nuclear weapons.
A bullseye is squarely on our nation’s businesses.
Organized cybercrime entities are joining forces, and their likelihood of detection and prosecution is estimated to be as low as 0.05 percent in the U.S., according to the World Economic Forum’s 2020 Global Risk Report.
RANSOMWARE
Ransomware — a malware that infects computers (and mobile devices) and restricts their access to files, often threatening permanent data destruction unless a ransom is paid — has reached epidemic proportions globally and is the “go-to method of attack” for cybercriminals.
A 2017 report from Cybersecurity Ventures predicted ransomware damages would cost the world $5 billion in 2017, up from $325 million in 2015 — a 15X increase in just two years. The damages for 2018 were estimated at $8 billion, and for 2019 the figure rose to $11.5 billion.
The latest forecast is for global ransomware damage costs to reach $20 billion by 2021 — which is 57X more than it was in 2015.
We predict there will be a ransomware attack on businesses every 11 seconds by 2021, up from every 40 seconds in 2016.
The FBI is particularly concerned with ransomware hitting healthcare providers, hospitals, 911 and first responders. These types of cyberattacks can impact the physical safety of American citizens, and this is the forefront of what Herb Stapleton, FBI cyber division section chief, and his team are focused on.
Last month, ransomware claimed its first life. German authorities reported a ransomware attack caused the failure of IT systems at a major hospital in Duesseldorf, and a woman who needed urgent admission died after she had to be taken to another city for treatment.
Ransomware, now the fastest growing and one of the most damaging types of cybercrime, will ultimately convince senior executives to take the cyber threat more seriously, according to Mark Montgomery, executive director at the U.S. Cyberspace Solarium Commission (CSC) — but he hopes it doesn’t come to that.
CYBER ATTACK SURFACE
The modern definition of the word “hack” was coined at MIT in April 1955. The first known mention of computer (phone) hacking occurred in a 1963 issue of The Tech. Over the past fifty-plus years, the world’s attack surface has evolved from phone systems to a vast datasphere outpacing humanity’s ability to secure it.
In 2013, IBM proclaimed data promises to be for the 21st century what steam power was for the 18th, electricity for the 19th and hydrocarbons for the 20th.
“We believe that data is the phenomenon of our time,” said Ginni Rometty, IBM Corp.’s executive chairman, in 2015, addressing CEOs, CIOs and CISOs from 123 companies in 24 industries at a conference in New York City. “It is the world’s new natural resource. It is the new basis of competitive advantage, and it is transforming every profession and industry. If all of this is true — even inevitable — then cyber crime, by definition, is the greatest threat to every profession, every industry, every company in the world.”
The world will store 200 zettabytes of data by 2025, according to Cybersecurity Ventures. This includes data stored on private and public IT infrastructures, on utility infrastructures, on private and public cloud data centers, on personal computing devices — PCs, laptops, tablets, and smartphones — and on IoT (Internet-of-Things) devices.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly half the U.S. labor force is working from home, according to Stanford University. As employees generate, access, and share more data remotely through cloud apps, the number of security blind spots balloons.
It’s predicted that the total amount of data stored in the cloud — which includes public clouds operated by vendors and social media companies (think Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Twitter, etc.), government-owned clouds that are accessible to citizens and businesses, private clouds owned by mid-to-large-sized corporations, and cloud storage providers — will reach 100 zettabytes by 2025, or 50 percent of the world’s data at that time, up from approximately 25 percent stored in the cloud in 2015.
Roughly one million more people join the internet every day. We expect there will be 6 billion people connected to the internet interacting with data in 2022, up from 5 billion in 2020 — and more than 7.5 billion internet users in 2030.
Cyber threats have expanded from targeting and harming computers, networks, and smartphones — to people, cars, railways, planes, power grids and anything with a heartbeat or an electronic pulse. Many of these Things are connected to corporate networks in some fashion, further complicating cybersecurity.
By 2023, there will be 3X more networked devices on Earth than humans, according to a report from Cisco. And by 2022, 1 trillion networked sensors will be embedded in the world around us, with up to 45 trillion in 20 years.
IP traffic has reached an annual run rate of 2.3 zettabytes in 2020, up from an annual run rate of 870.3 exabytes in 2015.
Data is the building block of the digitized economy, and the opportunities for innovation and malice around it are incalculable.
CYBERSECURITY SPENDING
In 2004, the global cybersecurity market was worth $3.5 billion — and in 2017 it was worth more than $120 billion. The cybersecurity market grew by roughly 35X during that 13-year period — prior to the latest market sizing by Cybersecurity Ventures.
Global spending on cybersecurity products and services for defending against cybercrime is projected to exceed $1 trillion cumulatively over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021.
“Most cybersecurity budgets at U.S. organizations are increasing linearly or flat, but the cyberattacks are growing exponentially,” says CSC’s Montgomery. This simple observation should be a wake-up call for C-suite executives.
Healthcare has lagged behind other industries and the tantalizing target on its back is attributable to outdated IT systems, fewer cybersecurity protocols and IT staff, extremely valuable data, and the pressing need for medical practices and hospitals to pay ransoms quickly to regain data. The healthcare industry will respond by spending $125 billion cumulatively from 2020 to 2025 to beef up its cyber defenses.
The FY 2020 U.S. President’s Budget includes $17.4 billion of budget authority for cybersecurity-related activities, a $790 million (5 percent) increase above the FY 2019 estimate, according to The White House. Due to the sensitive nature of some activities, this amount does not represent the entire cyber budget.
Cybersecurity Ventures anticipates 12-15 percent year-over-year cybersecurity market growth through 2025. While that may be a respectable increase, it pales in comparison to the cybercrime costs incurred.
SMALL BUSINESS
“There are 30 million small businesses in the U.S. that need to stay safe from phishing attacks, malware spying, ransomware, identity theft, major breaches and hackers who would compromise their security,” says Scott Schober, author of the popular books “Hacked Again” and “Cybersecurity Is Everybody’s Business.”
More than half of all cyberattacks are committed against small-to-midsized businesses (SMBs), and 60 percent of them go out of business within six months of falling victim to a data breach or hack.
66 percent of SMBs had at least one cyber incident in the past two years, according to Mastercard.
“Small and medium sized businesses lack the financial resources and skill set to combat the emerging cyber threat,” says Scott E. Augenbaum, former supervisory special agent at the FBI’s Cyber Division, Cyber Crime Fraud Unit, where he was responsible for managing the FBI’s Cyber Task Force Program and Intellectual Property Rights Program.
A Better Business Bureau survey found that for small businesses — which make up more than 97 percent of total businesses in North America — the primary challenges for more than 55 percent of them in order to develop a cybersecurity plan are a lack of resources or knowledge.
Ransomware attacks are of particular concern. “The cost of ransomware has skyrocketed and that’s a huge concern for small businesses — and it doesn’t look like there’s any end in sight,” adds Schober.
AI AUGMENTS CYBER DEFENDERS
You don’t bring a knife to a gunfight.
The U.S. has a total employed cybersecurity workforce consisting of nearly 925,000 people, and there are currently almost 510,000 unfilled positions, according to Cyber Seek, a project supported by the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE), a program of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Faced with a domestic worker shortage, the heads of U.S. cyber defense forces — CIOs and CISOs at America’s mid-sized to largest businesses — are beginning to augment their staff with next-generation AI and ML (machine learning) software and appliances aimed at detecting cyber intruders. These AI systems are trained on big data sets collected over decades — and they can analyze terabytes of data per day, a scale unimaginable for humans.
The panacea for a CISO is an AI system resembling a human expert’s investigative and reporting techniques so that cyber threats are remediated BEFORE the damage is done.
If enemies are using AI to launch cyberattacks, then our country’s businesses need to use AI to defend themselves.
FOR THE BOARDROOM
Cybersecurity begins at the top.
CSC has an urgent message for boardroom and C-suite executives: The status quo in cyberspace is unacceptable, which is spelled out in its groundbreaking 2020 Report which proposes a strategy of layered cyber deterrence — to protect all U.S. businesses and governments from cybercrime and cyberwarfare. But, this is hardly the first warning. “Some of the same things we’re recommending today, we were pushing 23 years ago,” says Montgomery.
Someone should be in the boardroom who will wave the red flag and get everyone else paying attention to the severity of cyber risks. Montgomery says attention is the number one priority, not bringing in a new CISO — instead empower the CISO that you have.
The value of a business depends largely on how well it guards its data, the strength of its cybersecurity, and its level of cyber resilience.
If there’s one takeaway from this report, then let it be this: Don’t let your boardroom be the weakest cybersecurity link.
U.S. BUDGETARY COSTS The vast economic impact of the U.S. post-9/11 wars goes beyond the Pentagon's "Overseas Contigency Operations" (War) budget. This chart and the attached paper estimate the more comprehensive budgetary costs of the wars.
Posted on September 1, 2021
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/figures/2021/BudgetaryCosts
False Jews: Edomites & European Converts
In the time of Nebuchadnezzar II the Edomites may have helped plunder Jerusalem and slaughter the Judaeans in 587 or 586 BCE (Psalms 137:7; Obadiah 1:11–14). Some believe that it is for this reason the prophets denounced Edom (Isaiah 34:5–8; Jeremiah 49:7–22; Obadiah passim).
Evidence also suggests that at that time Edom may have engaged in a treaty betrayal of Judah.[48] The people of Edom would be dealt with during the Messiah's rulership, according to the prophets.
Regarding the territory of Edom, the book of Jeremiah states that "no one will live there, nor will anyone of mankind reside in it"
The world can not for very much longer deny the true identity of the Biblical Israelites. Excavated archeology, unbiased and unadulterated history, various confessions from Israeli’s, Arabs, Egyptians, and Europeans, and last but not least Biblical prophecy all clearly and without doubt, reveals that the true, historic, Biblical Israelites, are a black people that have been scattered into slavery and cursed by God.
God told the nation of Israel that one of their many curses for disobedience would be that he would cause their “identity to cease from among men” (Deuteronomy 32).
This lost of identity culminated around 70 A.D. when Titus besieged Jerusalem and the hebrews of the land were either killed or displaced into Africa before being dispersed into all nations (via the slave trades) as prophesied by Jesus in Luke 21:24.
Israel’s captivity and lost of identity paved the way for another group of people to steal and appropriate the identity of the true, black Israelites that have been scattered into captivity and cursed by God.
This treacherous and abominable event is why the world does not know who the true Israelites are.
Thankfully, nothing can be hidden from God and since he has told the end from the beginning, he has revealed, uncovered, and exposed the perpetrators of his chosen people all throughout the Bible and History.
Let us look at the words of Jesus himself, to prove this:
Revelation 2:9
King James Version (KJV)
9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Revelation 3:9
King James Version (KJV)
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
It is clear that there are a group of people purporting to be the Biblical, original Jews, when in reality, they are not. Since we are dealing with identity, it is imperative that we examine history to assist us in unveiling who these purporting Jews really are. There are two main branches of lying “Jews” in the world today:
1) Edomites (Jacob’s twin brother) – a SEMITIC (non-European) group of people who stole Jacob’s (Israel) identity as prophesied in the Bible.
2) Ashkenazi Jews/Khazars – a group of Europeans who converted to Judaism (not Esau).
In 1982, Ella J. Hughley wrote a book called “The Truth About Black Biblical Hebrew-Israelites Jews: the Worlds Best Kept Secret.” Hughley’s chapter, “The White European Jews” was compelling and thought provoking as it aimed at answering questions such as:
1) Who are the White European Jews?
2) When did they convert to Judaism?
3) Are the “Jews” a race?
These questions are of utmost importance. Hughley writes, “Esau is the father of the white (in color but not in nationality) Edomites, also known as Idumeans, who, with other ethnic groups such as the Khazars (white Europeans/Caucasians) and others, make up modern Jewry as it is known today” (p. 35). “Khazars” are Southern Turkish Europeans who came into Israel after the Israelites were kicked out.
Hugely is not alone in her findings. The Hungarian-British author and journalist, Arthur Koestler published a book entitled, “The Thirteenth Tribe” in 1976. Koestler argued that the Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of the Khazars rather than biblical Israelites. Hughley references Koestler in this chapter.
In 2008, Israeli professor of History at Tel Aviv University, Shlomo Sand published “The Invention of the Jewish People”. Originally in Hebrew, his work (2008) proved that people commonly known as Jewish, never really existed as a ‘nation-race’ with a biblical origin, but rather they consist of descendants from the medieval Eurasian state of Khazaria.
He mentions how they adopted the customs known as Judaism today. Genesis 10, commonly known as the “Table of Nations”, traces the lineage of the European converts to Noah’s son, Japheth whose descendants are commonly referred to as “Gentiles” in the bible but by historians as the “Indo-European stock”.
As for the Khazar’s conversion, “The Khazars (white Europeans/Japhetic in origins) converted to Judaism in 740 A.D. According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, (Vol. V, (1904), p 41), the Khazars are “A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews in Russia . . . Historical evidence points to the region of the Urals as the home of the Chazars”.
Ashkenazi Jewish author and historian, the late Arthur Koestler agrees that the large majority of Jews are of Khazar and not Semitic origin. “That their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan, but from the Caucasus; . . . and that genetically they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob”.
Historian H.G. Wells states, “. . . the Idumeans (Edomites) were . . . made Jews, . . . and a Turkish people (Khazars) were mainly Jews in South Russia . . . The main part of Jewry never was in Judea and had never come out of Judea” (The Outline of History, 3rd Edition., p 494).
Esau is not “The White Man” aka European
Jacob-Esau-Resized
It is important to note that contrary to popular belief the Ashkenazi/Khazar’s are GENTILES and are NOT EDOM/ESAU like many tend to believe. It is also important to understand that ESAU (not the European convert jews) are the the current day ISRAELI’S and are responsible for stealing Israel’s identity.
Esau is a descendant from Isaac and twin brother of Jacob in Genesis 25, which makes him Semitic.
The White Man (Gentiles) comes from Japheth in Genesis 10
This is one of the reasons why people call Esau, the White Man:
In Hebrew, the word Ashkenazi means “German” and the term is used for Jews of Eastern European origin who historically spoke the Yiddish or Judeo-German language. Arthur Koestler’s “Thirteenth Tribe” narrative motivated a few biologists like Dr. Eran Elhaik to likewise claim that contemporary Jews are Khazars, not the Israelite descendants of Abraham and Sarah. (Hitler’s Doubles, Peter Fotis Kapnistos, p. 157)
However, you don’t have to make Esau out to be Gentiles to prove that they are not Israelites. When we understand the Bible we realize that people are not “mixed” or “bi-racial”, rather we are all simply whatever nationality our Father is. Like Timothy was a Greek even tho his mother was a Jew which is just like Bob Marley who was a Gentile because his father was a white man even tho his mother was black.
Therefore, we should not get caught up on color. This whole thing is not about color, it is about nationality. Color does not mean anything because genetically speaking, Israel – a dark skinned people are more closely linked to Esau who is considered “red” than to Hamites (Africans) who are also dark skinned.
Furthermore, the Edomites and Gentiles understand that they are not the same group of people. Thus, it is only misinformed people that confuse the two groups. That is why the Edomites will label white people as anti-semitic and call them racist slurs like honkey’s and that is why many white Nationalists are anti-Jewish and are apart of controversial organizations such as the American Nazi party.
The below article – DNA Samples Confirm Ashkenazi Jews are from European Descent” shows us that Ashkenazi Jews maternal/mother lineage comes from Europe. But they are of Edom descendants because you are what you father is, therefore they are not Gentiles.
When Edom disappeared from history around 70 AD the Edomites migrated to Europe. It is only around 1948 that many of them moved into the state of Israel which was created by the “White Men” of Britain and the United Nations.
So if the false theory of the Jews being mostly Khazar or Ashkenazi (Gentiles) is true, then you should ask yourself, where are the Edomites? Because the Lord said that the Edomites are the ones that occupy the Promised Land.
Jeremiah 49:10
King James Version (KJV)
10 But I have made Esau bare, I have uncovered his secret places, and he shall not be able to hide himself: his seed is spoiled, and his brethren, and his neighbours, and he is not.
This article from the Science World Report shows the migration of the Edomites and how they travelled into Europe and took wives from the Europeans which is also another reason why they look similar to Europeans even tho they are not Europeans.
Now that we know who the European Jews mainly consist of, let us turn to the main perpetrators of Israel’s identity, the Israeli’s that call themselves Jews and do lie, are none other than Jacob’s semitic twin brother, Esau/Edom aka Idumeans.
To understand this appropriation in its totality we must refer back to the prophets of the Bible and the history of Jacob and Esau as recorded in Genesis 25-27.
While pregnant, the God of Israel told their mother Rebekah that she had two separate nations (one would be black and the other red and hairy) in her womb and that the Elder would serve the younger. Edom (the elder) ended up selling his birthright to Jacob for some red pottage.
Many theologians and writers on this topic erroneously infer that Jacob stole Esau’s birthright. However, this is a false assertion that is cleared up with the scriptures.
It is very clear that enmity existed between these two brothers while they were in the womb (Genesis 25:22-23). More importantly, Jacob did not steal Esau’s birthright as it is explicitly recorded twice in the bible that Esau sold his birthright to Jacob in Genesis 25:31-33 and Hebrews 12:16.
We do not read that Jacob stole Esau’s birthright, we read that Esau sold his birthright to Jacob.
Yet, even after he sold his birthright/blessing, he still tried to receive the blessing from Isaac that went to Jacob which shows his cunningness.
Even though Esau did not receive his birthright he did receive another blessing from Isaac which included him inheriting the fatness (or wealth) of the earth, which is why they are known to be inherently wealthy, bankers, financiers, money changers, and control many of the wealthiest Western industries such as Hollywood.
Jacob (the younger), ended up receiving the birthright which included his name being changed to Israel (Genesis 32:24-28), inheriting the land of Canaan (Exodus 3:6-10), and being commissioned as a holy nation of priests and kings to all kindred’s and tongues (Exodus 19:5-6).
They entered into a covenant with God and God promised that if they would obey Him and keep his commandments that their land, sustenance, children, and all that they owned and did would be blessed (Deuteronomy 28:1-14).
However, if they were to disobey God and break his commandments then he would curse their entire nation with affliction, oppression, and disease, remove them from the Promised Land and scatter them into slavery throughout the world by way of slave ships (Deuteronomy 28:15-68). Unfortunately for the nation of Israel, they choose to rebel against God and break his commandments.
Therefore, he put them under the divine curse that he forewarned them of (Daniel 9). The curses of Israel which include deplorable socio-economic conditions in slavery as well as their physical description proves that the Edomites or the one’s claiming to be Jews today are not the Biblical Israelites.
The Edomites took advantage of their brother’s destruction and since they have always thought that they deserved the birthright which they sold, they used this opportunity to appropriate Jacob’s land, heritage and identity.
13243945_1623870251267821_4745319374872364484_o
There is a great deal of historic sources that explain the gradual process of how the Edomites converted to what is known as Judaism, occupied the land of Israel, and eventually became known as the biblical Israelites.
For the Edomites, this process started as early as the 6th century B.C.E. as a result of forced migration by the hands of the Nabateans (who are reported a Northern Arabian tribe).
They were driven out of their own land commonly known as Idumea and inhabited Southern Judea. How were they able to occupy Southern Judah? God had foretold that the Israelites would be taken into captivity by the Babylonians for 70 years (Jeremiah 25:3-12).
During this time, the Edomites were forced out of their land by the Nabateans and started to settle in Southern Judah. Eventually, Cyrus, the king of Persia, proclaims an edict that allows Israel to go back into Judah and rebuild the third temple after their 70 year captivity in Babylon (Ezra 1:1-3).
When Israel returned to Judah after their 70 year captivity, they were cut of from Hebron because the Edomites had established themselves there. This was the beginning of their identity theft.
Atlas of the Bible, p. 148 – The Return :
“At some point, but no later than 522BC, a second great group of Babylonian Jews came to Jerusalem and then settled, each to his own town. The list of these towns in Ezra 2:2-35 and Nehemiah 7:6-38, indicate that the returning of Jews, established themselves in an area, roughly 40 miles east to west by 30 miles north to south in the hill country of Judah. On the east, they extended to the Jordan valley around Jericho, while to the west, they penetrated the coastal plain, settling in Lod and Ono. To the North, they reached beyond the old border of Judah to Bethel. In the South, they held strategic sites of Beth-Zur, but were cut off from Hebron, which was in the hands of the Edomites. Although the area was small, the Jews controlled vital approaches to the highlands. Yet, they could not be secure until Jerusalem, the leading city and place of ultimate refuge was refortified.”
The Sarcophagus of an Ancient Civilization: Petra, Edom, and the Edomites (Idumeans) p. 369-370 – History of the Idumeans.:
“Judea and Idumea, (Sir) George Adam Smith (theologian and historian) made Idumea of that time, to include the southern shepolah, with the Negev. Adding that the Edomites had come upon it during the Jewish exile and after the return of the Jews, they continued to hold the greater part of it. Whatever the extent of Idumea originally may have been, it is certain that when the sons of Esau came into Palestine in the 6th century BC, they settled in close juxtaposition and stood face to face with their age old brothers and rivals, the sons of Jacob. Whether Cyrus in 536 BC dislodged them from certain parts of Judah in order to give the returning exiles of Israel a foothold, we do not know.
But it is more likely as Ewald observed three quarters of a century ago, that this monarch was by no means prepared to expel the Idumeans from the land which they had already occupied and cultivated for 50 or 60 years. On the other hand, the prophet Malachi points to them as the object of Jehovah’s displeasure in his day as a people; “Against whom Jehovah had indication forever, Saying Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated”. By which He probably meant that the Israelites have already been brought back from captivity but the Edomites are still in exile, having been expelled by the Nabateans. During all of the centuries of their occupation of Judah, the Jews regarded them with suspicion.
Their unbrotherly treatment of them on the occasion of Jerusalem’s downfall in 586 BC was never forgotten. In 164 BC, Judas Maccabee’s fought them with triumphant success. Less than 50 years thereafter, John Hyrcanus completely conquered them, not only wrestling from them two of their most powerful strongholds, Adorah and Maresha, and placing them under a Jewish governor, but compelling them also to submit to circumcision and the Jewish law.”
In an article on “Edom”, the Jewish Encyclopdia (1925 edition), has this statement: ”(In 163BC) Judas Maccabeus conquered their territory for a time. They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (about 125 BC), by whom they were forced to observe Jewish rites and laws.
They were then incorporated with the Jewish nation, and their country was called by the Greeks and Romans, “Idumea.” With Antipater began the Idumean dynasty that ruled over Judea till its conquest by the Romans . . . From this time the Idumeans ceased to be a separate people . . .”
So a hundred years before Christ, Judah was inhabited by Edomites and native Israelites who were both followers of Talmudic Judaism, seeming to heal the breach between Jacob and Esau. But the Edomites proved to be a discordant element. And in 37BC, Herod the Great (74-4BC), an Idumean or Edomite whose wife Mariamne was a Maccabean, became at the age of 36, undisputed ruler of Judea.
The Pharisees gained ascendancy over the Sadducees, and there were so many Edomites in the population at the time of Christ that the land was called Idumea (Mark 3:8). The Edomites participated in the defence of Jerusalem against the Romans during Titus’ siege (AD66-70).
According to The Jewish Encyclopedia (1904, Vol. V, p 41), “Immediately before the siege of Jerusalem 20,000 Idumeans appeared before Jerusalem to fight in behalf of the Zealots who were besieged in the Temple”. More than a million inhabitants of Judea died and 97,000 were taken captive. An unknown number had fled either before or during the siege.
Drawing on the record of Flavius Josephus’ The Great Roman Jewish War: 70 A.D. we are informed that Hasmonean leader, John Hyracanus conquered the entire land of Edom “and undertook the forced conversion of its inhabitants to Judaism”.
This is when the Edomites became a section of the Jewish people. Josephus also points out that the tyrannical king Herod was in fact an Edomite who was appointed king of Judea by the Romans in 40 B.C.E. and by 6 B.C.E., “Edom became part of the Roman province of Judea” (p. 43-44).
they left black
In 70 A.D., they assisted the Romans to help Emperor Titus besiege Jerusalem, and as a result many Israelites were crucified, starved, and to escape persecution almost all of the Jews fled into North Africa.
Luke 21:20-24
King James Version (KJV)
20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.
21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.
22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
23 But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.
24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
Arch_of_Titus_Menorah
The last Two Million Years, pg. 87 – Faith survives the dispersion:
“The crucifixion of Jesus about AD 30 did not end Jewish resistance to the Roman occupation. In 70, when the country was again in a state of revolt, Jerusalem, the holy city, became the core of resistance to the Romans. Titus, the son of Emperor Vespasian preceded to lay siege to Jerusalem. The city fall and the inhabitants were enslaved in their thousands and dispersed throughout the Mediterranean world. This was the first dispersion and worse was yet to follow. Continual insurrections and revolts again Roman rule led to the total destruction of Jerusalem in 135. The city was renamed Aelia Capitolina and all Jews were prohibited from entering it. A second and more important dispersion not took place and the whole of Judea was renamed, Palestine.”
Once the Roman siege and occupation of Israel took place – in which the Edomites helped to achieve – they were able to completely inhabit the land of Israel.
Obadiah 1-3, 8-15
King James Version (KJV)
1 The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord God concerning Edom; We have heard a rumour from the Lord, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle.
2 Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: thou art greatly despised.
3 The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?
8 Shall I not in that day, saith the Lord, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?
9 And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter.
10 For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever.
11 In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them.
12 But thou shouldest not have looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stranger; neither shouldest thou have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day of their destruction; neither shouldest thou have spoken proudly in the day of distress.
13 Thou shouldest not have entered into the gate of my people in the day of their calamity; yea, thou shouldest not have looked on their affliction in the day of their calamity, nor have laid hands on their substance in the day of their calamity;
14 Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.
15 For the day of the Lord is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head.
Edom/Esau/Idumean disappears from Geography and History in 70 A.D. – The same year that Rome sieges Jerusalem and the Biblical Israelites go into captivity! This was able to take place because they moved into the land of Israel!
Zondervan Pictorial Bible Dictionary p. 233-234 – Edom:
“Edomites, the nation and its people who are descendants of Esau. He founded the country, so his name is equated with Edom. The country was also called Sier or Mount Sier, which was the name of the territory in which the Edomites lived. The mountain and the plateau area between the Dead Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba. About 100 miles long and up to 40 miles wide. The Edomites were also subject to Babylon. Under the Persian Empire, Edom became a province called Idumea, the Greek form of Edom. In 325 BC, an Arab tribe known as the Nabateans, conquered the Eastern part of Edom’s territory. In Maccabean times, John Hyrcanus subdued the Idumeans and forced them to accept Judaism. When the Romans took over Palestine, the Edomites also were included. From Idumea came Antipater, the Father of Herod the Great. He became pro-curator of Judea. After the destruction of Jerusalem, by the Romans, in 70 AD, the Idumeans disappeared from history.
Map of Southern Levant c830 BCE – Edom is on the map, south of the Kingdom of Judah.
Map_of_the_Levant
First Century Map of Judea – Idumea was still on the map.
A_history_of_the_Jewish_people_during_the_Maccabean_and_Roman_periods_(including_New_Testament_times)_(1900)_(14576629399)
World Scope Encyclopedia, Volume 5 & 6 – Edom
“Meaning Red, the name given to Esau on account of the red pottage secured by him by his brother Jacob. The name was also given to the country settled by Esau, having been previously known as Mount. Seir. It was about one hundred miles long and twenty miles wide, and was situated between the Dead Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba, in land from the Red Sea. Bozrah, now Busaira, situated in the extreme northern part, was the chief city and the capital. During the reigns of David and Solomon, Edom was under subjection to the Israelites. Later, the Edomites ravaged the southern borders of Palestine and were denounced with considerable vehemence, by some of the prophets of Israel. After the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, the name of Edom or Idumea disappeared from Geography.”
Palestine today (Idumea disappears off map)
maps-palestine-today
Edom was able to disappear from history after the Roman conquest of Jerusalem because the indigenous Israelites were subdued, removed from their land, and sent into slavery.
King David prophecies about the confederacy that Esau (Israeli’s) and Ishmael (Palestinians) conspired in order to distort the memory of Israel (they have done this because the masses do not know who the true Israelites are), remove them from their land, and take the land of Israel for their own possession.
Esau and Ishmael are rivals and the only time they have agreed was when they are working together to take Israel’s name out of existence.
Israelies-Puerta-Damasco-Jerusalen-AP_LNCIMA20130730_0033_3
Psalm 83:1-6
King James Version (KJV)
1 Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.
2 For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
3 They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:
6 The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes;
12 Who said, Let us take to ourselves the houses of God in possession.
blog14
God foretold that Edom (Mt. Sier) would possess the land of Israel and say that Israel and Judah belonged to them! This was fulfilled in 1982.
Ezekiel 35
King James Version (KJV)
35 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, set thy face against mount Seir, and prophesy against it,
3 And say unto it, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, O mount Seir, I am against thee, and I will stretch out mine hand against thee, and I will make thee most desolate.
4 I will lay thy cities waste, and thou shalt be desolate, and thou shalt know that I am the Lord.
5 Because thou hast had a perpetual hatred, and hast shed the blood of the children of Israel by the force of the sword in the time of their calamity, in the time that their iniquity had an end:
6 Therefore, as I live, saith the Lord God, I will prepare thee unto blood, and blood shall pursue thee: sith thou hast not hated blood, even blood shall pursue thee.
7 Thus will I make mount Seir most desolate, and cut off from it him that passeth out and him that returneth.
8 And I will fill his mountains with his slain men: in thy hills, and in thy valleys, and in all thy rivers, shall they fall that are slain with the sword.
9 I will make thee perpetual desolations, and thy cities shall not return: and ye shall know that I am the Lord.
10 Because thou hast said, These two nations and these two countries shall be mine, and we will possess it; whereas the Lord was there:
11 Therefore, as I live, saith the Lord God, I will even do according to thine anger, and according to thine envy which thou hast used out of thy hatred against them; and I will make myself known among them, when I have judged thee.
12 And thou shalt know that I am the Lord, and that I have heard all thy blasphemies which thou hast spoken against the mountains of Israel, saying, They are laid desolate, they are given us to consume.
13 Thus with your mouth ye have boasted against me, and have multiplied your words against me: I have heard them.
14 Thus saith the Lord God; When the whole earth rejoiceth, I will make thee desolate.
15 As thou didst rejoice at the inheritance of the house of Israel, because it was desolate, so will I do unto thee: thou shalt be desolate, O mount Seir, and all Idumea, even all of it: and they shall know that I am the Lord.
Menachem Begin
Sun Times Article, September 9th, 1982 – “West Bank forever vows Begin”:
“Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin vehemently rejected president Reagan’s Middle East peace initiative Wednesday, and declared that the occupied West Bank will be for the Jewish people for all generations. Pounding the podium for emphasis, Begin told the tumultuous session of the parliament, that Reagan’s plan was “unacceptable because it would endanger our lives, our homeland, the lands of our fathers, and sons”… “The world will witness whose dedication will win” Begin said, “if someone tried to take Judea and Samaria, the West Bank from us, we will tell him, Judea and Samaria for the Jewish people for all generations”.
This is why Jesus exposed the blasphemous Edomites who have appropriated the identity of the true Jews!!
Revelation 3:9
King James Version (KJV)
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
CONCLUSION:
The Edomites and Khazars, along with many other Indo-European ethnic groups, make up modern Jewery.
Christians and non-Christians need to realize that the people who are in the land of Israel today are not the Hebrews or Jews of the Bible and therefore, they should not be supported and more importantly they should not be followed spiritually because as seen above they are the synagogue of Satan which means that they are not worshipping God.
Although the black Hebrew-Israelites are the real descendants of ancient Israel and God’s chosen people that the world must follow for salvation, this truth is not known by many and it is the world’s best kept secret.
the kingship of Edom was, at least in early times, not hereditary, perhaps elective.
The first book of Chronicles mentions both a king and chieftains.
Moses and the Israelite people twice appealed to their common ancestry and asked the king of Edom for passage through his land, along the "King's Highway", on their way to Canaan, but the king refused permission.
Accordingly, they detoured around the country because of his show of force or because God ordered them to do so rather than wage war (Deuteronomy 2:4–6). The King of Edom did not attack the Israelites, though he prepared to resist aggression.
Nothing further is recorded of the Edomites in the Tanakh until their defeat by King Saul of Israel in the late 11th century BC (1 Samuel 14:47).
Forty years later King David and his general Joab defeated the Edomites in the "Valley of Salt" (probably near the Dead Sea; 2 Samuel 8:13–14; 1 Kings 9:15–16). An Edomite prince named Hadad escaped and fled to Egypt, and after David's death returned and tried to start a rebellion, but failed and went to Syria (Aramea).
From that time Edom remained a vassal of Israel.
David placed over the Edomites Israelite governors or prefects, and this form of government seems to have continued under Solomon.
When Israel divided into two kingdoms Edom became a dependency of the Kingdom of Judah. In the time of Jehoshaphat (c. 870 – 849 BC) the Tanakh mentions a king of Edom, who was probably an Israelite deputy appointed by the King of Judah. It also states that the inhabitants of Mount Seir invaded Judea in conjunction with Ammon and Moab, and that the invaders turned against one another and were all destroyed (2 Chronicles 20:10–23).
Edom revolted against Jehoram and elected a king of its own (2 Kings 8:20–22; 2 Chronicles 21:8).
Amaziah attacked and defeated the Edomites, seizing Selah, but the Israelites never subdued Edom completely (2 Kings 14:7; 2 Chronicles 25:11–12).
Declassified documents show that the Nazis developed a three-step plan before the end of the war to prepare for the 4th Reich in South America:
establish sleeper cells, funnel money, and build a strategic rear base.
Since the conclusion of the Hunting Hitler investigation, more information has been brought to light that show these three phases were more mature than ever previously thought – from a 2020 release that shows 12,000 Nazis in South America holding Swiss bank accounts after WWII, to Mi5 files revealing that Nazi spies successfully infiltrated America completely undetected.
the 4th Reich’s plan and determine once and for all just how close they came to achieving their ultimate goal of attacking America.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BD-c78ZPiFQ
Nazi Weapons: 23 Crazy Devices Only They Could Have Dreamed Up
From the Vampir to the Fire Lilly to the Sun Gun, these outlandish Nazi weapons would have been devastating if they'd ever seen much action.
Nazi Weapons: 23 Crazy Devices Only They Could Have Dreamed Up
View Gallery:
https://allthatsinteresting.com/nazi-weapons
Wunderwaffe. Even in the original German, the term (which translates to "wonder weapon") sounds positively pleasant.
However, the terrifying yet often comedically ambitious weapons to which the Nazis applied this term during World War II were anything but.
From cannons to missiles to tanks, the Nazis dreamed up dozens upon dozens of weapons so outlandish, so potentially devastating that they could have come from no other group in history.
And history might have looked a lot different had the Nazis been able to actually complete these weapons, or at least reliably produce them on a large scale. But most of the time Hitler's reach far exceeded his grasp.
While these experimental wonder weapons saw little to no action, they remain fascinating what-ifs today. They're now artifacts of a time before nuclear weapons and military satellites and advanced computer circuitry, a time when guiding a missile to a target meant putting a man inside of it, a time when having the mightiest arsenal literally meant having the largest gun.
Although the Nazis didn't always succeed in having the largest gun -- literally and figuratively -- they certainly tried, and often came terrifyingly close.
From the Fire Lilly to the Vampir to the Sun Gun, above you'll find 23 of the most astounding Nazi weapons that, thankfully, never came to be.
Nazis were given luxury treatment at a clandestine camp in the US
A new documentary from Netflix explores the pleasant lives led by Nazi ... This was an unbelievable relationship forming there, between the Jewish refugees ...
How German WW2 Technology Helped Seed the World's Greatest ...
Nov 8, 2021 ... One of the most famous "confiscated" technologies of the Second World War was the jet engine. Developed in Germany by Hans von Ohain, who ...
https://allthatsinteresting.com/nazi-weapons
Nazi Weapons: 23 Crazy Devices Only They Could Have Dreamed Up
Oct 18, 2016 ... Among Nazi Germany's most pioneering and successful military advances was its series of Aggregat rockets. This series' success hit its high ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuh9qAgxQeY
The Powerful Secrets Of Nazi Science | Timeline - YouTube
May 3, 2022 ... This doc reveals the circumstances scientists faced under Hitler, and tracks amazing technological innovations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfKC_XRRxvE
In Search of Aliens: WWII Time Travel Warfare (S1, E2) | Full Episode
Dec 12, 2021 ... At the height of World War II, the Nazis engaged their top scientists to develop "wonder weapons" --weapons that were so advanced they could ...
https://owlcation.com/humanities/Top-10-Secret-Weapons-of-Nazi-Germany
Top 10 Secret Military Weapons of Nazi Germany - Owlcation
Jul 19, 2022 ... Although amazing Nazi weapons such as Call of Duty's “Wunderwaffe DG-2” ... the technology for the Sun Gun was 50 to 100 years out of reach.
https://www.thecollector.com/wunderwaffe-super-weapons-ww2/
Wunderwaffe! 8 Superweapons of the Nazis - TheCollector
Jul 8, 2022 ... Some of these weapons were truly terrifying, utilizing technology that ... achieve unbelievable speeds that were unheard of at the time.
What where the reasons behind the unbelievable amount of ... - Quora
What where the reasons behind the unbelievable amount of technology that came out of Nazi Germany in such a small timescale? The sheer amount of German ...
https://gizmodo.com/the-definitive-collection-of-secret-nazi-weapons-1473126559
The definitive collection of secret Nazi weapons - Gizmodo
Dec 18, 2013 ... ... vertical launch rocket fighters, or infrared visors are just a few of many in this definitive collection of incredible Nazi weapons.
10 Products Created By Nazi Germany That Are Still Used Today
May 29, 2020 ... An iconic vehicle today, the Volkswagen Beetle was commissioned by Hitler in the 1930s as the “peoples car”, designed as a practical, affordable ...
https://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/feature/nazi-technology/index.html
Nazi Technology | History Detectives - PBS
Many of those scientists had questionable pasts. Braun himself had been an active member of the Nazi party, and his colleague at NASA, Dr. Hubertus Strughold, a ...
The HISTORY® Channel, a division of A+E Networks, is the premier destination for historical storytelling. From best-in-class documentary events, to a signature slate of industry leading nonfiction series and premium fact-based scripted programming, The HISTORY® Channel serves as the most trustworthy source of informational entertainment in media. The HISTORY® channel has been named the #1 U.S. TV network in buzz for seven consecutive years by YouGov BrandIndex, and a top favorite TV network by Beta Research Corporation. For a deeper dive, visit history.com or follow @history on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and TikTok. For additional press materials visit the A+E Networks Press Center at http://press.aenetworks.com
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41238463
Volksgemeinschaft Engineers: The Nazi "Voyages of Technology"
that Nazi ideology embraced modern technology and that engineers such as ... German technology must have appeared to most people as an unbelievable.
https://nypost.com/2015/06/27/meet-the-man-who-owns-the-worlds-largest-nazi-collection/
This man owns the largest collection of Nazi artifacts - New York Post
Jun 27, 2015 ... None of the major auction houses will handle Nazi memorabilia and eBay ... recovery were far more interesting than the objects themselves.
https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2019/09/freuds-last-days-in-vienna-as-nazis-approached/
Freud's Last Days in Vienna as Nazis Approached | Timeless
Sep 23, 2019 ... The personal papers of Sigmund Freud at the Library of Congress have been digitized and are available online Included on the Library's ...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-51204090
'I was 90% dead': Henri's story of surviving Auschwitz - BBC News
Jan 27, 2020 ... Henri Kichka lost his family in the Nazi death camp, but lived on to ... It married the technology of the railway and the factory with the ...
https://medium.com/exploring-history/19-insider-images-of-hitlers-war-
machine-that-will-leave-you-stunned-29a32b13fce9
19 Insider Images of Hitler's War Machine That Will Leave You ...
In-depth pictorial exploration of Nazi military technology. ... Unbelievable stories of simple photos — from mundane to memorable. medium.com ...
Mar 7, 2023 ... Cyndi Lauper compares anti-LGBTQ bills to Nazi Germany: 'This is how ... Average Nursing Salary in 2023 is Just Unbelievable (View List).
https://today.ucsd.edu/story/psychiatrist_joel_dimsdale_deciphers_psyche_of_nazi_leaders_in_new_book_ana
Psychiatrist Joel Dimsdale Deciphers Psyche of Nazi Leaders in ...
Apr 28, 2016 ... “The Nazi hierarchy was responsible for an unbelievable amount of suffering and carnage,” said Dimsdale. “At the end of the war, 75% of ...
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-97999-1_8
The Nazi's Pursuit for a “Humane” Method of Killing | SpringerLink
Dec 28, 2018 ... Put simply, many Nazis believed extermination to be necessary, and for the German camp staff Zyklon-B helped deactivate the censuring gaze of ...
https://facts.net/nazi-party-facts/
Nazi Party: 50 Facts About The National Socialist - Facts.net
Jun 7, 2022 ... Definitely one of those unbelievable Nazi Party facts. The swastika is the Nazi Party symbol. The principal symbol of the Nazis was the swastika ...
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/01/man-in-the-high-castle-when-a-nazi-ruled-world-isnt-so-dystopian/384708/
'The Man in the High Castle': When a Nazi-Run World Isn't So ...
Jan 22, 2015 ... The Nazis won World War II, and the American flag now bears a swastika. ... Make your inbox more interesting with newsletters from your ...
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/central-european-history/article/volksgemeinschaft-engineers-the-nazi-voyages-of-technology/29A322122EEBE44FE2A62714BF8B71F5
Volksgemeinschaft Engineers: The Nazi “Voyages of Technology”
“The special train of German technology in the Sudentengau demonstrates that . . . the German engineer is also a great activist and propagandist.” Fritz Todt in ...
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/626561/strange-weapons-world-war-ii
10 Strange Weapons Invented During World War II - Mental Floss
Jul 16, 2020 ... Of the numerous Nazi Wunderwaffen (wonder weapons) developed during World War II, the Windkanone, or Wind Cannon, was one of the least ...
https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=845485
NAZI GERMANY'S MASS MEDIA INFLUENCE APPROACH
Jun 14, 2019 ... Nazi Germany propagandists effectively massed multiple media dissemination means to ... technology was utilized to increase their propaganda ...
https://www.mapquest.com/travel/10-significant-world-war-ii-sites-to-visit-in-germany/
10 Significant World War II Sites to Visit in Germany - MapQuest Travel
Sep 17, 2015 ... Vorbunker and Führerbunker were once the places where Adolf Hitler took shelter and eventually lived. The elaborate underground concrete ...
https://www.watchmojo.com/video/id/19217
Top 5 Disturbing Facts About Nazi Experiments - WatchMojo
Delving deep into the atrocities committed by the Third Reich, we'll be exploring the evil lengths to which Nazi Germany went with their inhumane scientific ...
https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/26020/why-were-the-germans-during-the-nazi-era-so-inventive
Why were the Germans during the Nazi era so inventive? [closed]
Oct 20, 2015 ... Operation Paperclip. It is amazing how the USA and the USSR both made the same technological discoveries shortly after the War. Hello Space Race ...
https://bookauthority.org/books/best-nazi-germany-books
20 Best Nazi Germany Books of All Time - BookAuthority
The 20 best nazi germany books recommended by Ben Wikler, Mark Suster, Javed Akhtar, Jason Goldman and (((Jon Benjamin))). ... Appreciate this amazing life.
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/nazi-secret-weapons-changed-wars-outcome/story?id=10252843
Could Nazi Secret Weapons Have Changed the Course of War?
Mar 31, 2010 ... Under Hitler's heavy hand, the German military developed some of the world's most destructive technology during World War II.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/hitler-secretly-made-the-weapons-of-the-future-during-the-second-world-war-10489978.html
Hitler secretly made the weapons of the future during the Second ...
Sep 7, 2015 ... Hitler's Nazi engineers made technological developments which were innovative and far ahead of their time, manufacturing weapons such as ...
https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/second-world-war-weapons-that-failed
Second World War Weapons That Failed | Imperial War Museums
This ungainly device was intended to be used against the beach defenses of Hitler's Atlantic Wall. It consisted of two rocket-propelled wheels, ...
=====
Wunderwaffe! 8 Superweapons of the Nazis
During the Second World War, the Germans created some of the most advanced weapons, pushing the boundaries between reality and science fiction.
Jul 8, 2022 • By Greg Beyer, BA History and Linguistics, Diploma in Journalism
wunderwaffe horten h229 aerial view
Throughout the Second World War, the Nazis created a slew of unorthodox weapons, some of which saw battlefield action and some of which never made it out of the concept stage.
Some of these weapons were truly terrifying, utilizing technology that very few people had seen before.
They struck terror into the hearts of their victims, whether those victims were soldiers on the battlefield or civilians in the cities and towns.
Most of these weapons were revolutionary in design and went on to become the fathers and grandfathers of weapons systems that we have today, as their ideas were improved upon by the victors of World War II. And while some were awe-inspiring and impressive beyond a doubt, some were truly bizarre. Here are some of the most noteworthy examples of the Wunderwaffe inventory.
1. Me-262 “Schwalbe”: Germany’s Flying Wunderwaffe
wunderwaffe world war ii me 262
An Me-262 at the Berlin Airshow in 2010, from Fabrizio Bensch/ Reuters, via Der Spiegel
The Me-262 “Schwalbe” (Swallow) was the world’s first jet-powered fighter aircraft and arguably the most prominent of Hitler’s Wunderwaffe aircraft. It would have seen active service earlier in the war, but problems with metal quality, engine, and political interference meant the aircraft only saw action from April 1944. The Me-262 was so superior in the air that the Allies could only counter its effectiveness by destroying it on the ground and during take-off and landing. Its incredibly high rate of climb compared with prop-driven fighter planes at the time meant that once airborne, the Me-262 was almost impossible to intercept.
Had the Me-262 been introduced earlier in the war, it might have had a significant impact, but the reality was that too few were manufactured. Allied bombing had a disastrous effect on Germany’s ability to source quality material, and it slowed down production time drastically. As a result, Germany decided to focus on producing aircraft that were easier to manufacture.
2. The V-1
v 1 buzz bomb
The V-1, via roundsixpod.com
It went by many names. The Germans named it the Kirschkern (Cherry Stone) or the Maikäfer (Maybug), while the British called it the “Buzz Bomb” and the “Doodlebug.” The Reich Aviation Ministry designated it the “Fi 103,” but whatever name it went by, the V-1 was a terrifying weapon. It was the first of the so-called Vergeltungswaffen, or “Vengeance Weapons,” used by Nazi Germany and designed to strike terror into the hearts of the enemy. The V-1 was the world’s first cruise missile.
The Nazis first launched V-1s at London on June 13, 1944, one week after the Allied landings at Normandy. At first, over a hundred V-1s were being launched every day, but as the Allies progressed further eastwards, the V-1s limited range meant that targets had to move eastwards as well. As England fell out of range, V-1s were launched at targets in the Netherlands and Belgium and continued right up until the end of the war.
Defenses against the V-1 included barrage balloons and the usual anti-aircraft guns, but one method was effective, albeit extremely dangerous. Fighter pilots could use their aircraft’s wing to flip the V-1 upside down in flight and confuse its guidance system.
Ultimately, the V-1 proved effective in that it was cost-effective for Germany, and it forced Britain to divert much of its war effort into defending against them. By the end of the war, many thousands of V-1s had been launched.
3. Me-163 “Komet”
wunderwaffe me 163
The Me-163, via aeropedia.com.au
The Me-163 represented an extremely bold experiment with weaponry. This Wunderwaffe was extremely dangerous to fly, partly due to the fact that it was not a true jet aircraft but a flying rocket with a skid for landing gear. Upon take-off, the wheels would detach, and landing would require the pilot to land the plane on the runway using a skid.
The hazardous operation of this aircraft was also compounded by the highly volatile rocket propellant called “T-Stoff,” which led to many mishaps, including the death of the high-ranking Oberleutnant and fighter ace Josef Pöhs.
The fact that the aircraft was rocket-powered meant that it could achieve unbelievable speeds that were unheard of at the time. It was the first piloted aircraft to reach a speed of over 1,000 kilometers per hour, and its record speed is 1,130 kilometers per hour (700mph). For comparison, the top speed of the P51-Mustang, considered a very fast prop-driven aircraft, was 440 miles per hour (708kph).
Only 370 Me-163s were ever built, and despite their revolutionary design and incredible speed, they proved to be underwhelming in their performance. Ten were lost in combat, while the Me-163 shot down only between nine and eighteen Allied aircraft.
4. Schwerer Gustav
schwere gustav hitler
Hitler and his generals inspecting the largest gun ever built, “Schwerer Gustav,” via worldwar2facts.org
Schwerer (heavy) Gustav was the largest artillery piece to have ever been built. It was a railway gun designed specifically for destroying French forts along the Maginot line. The gun was not ready in time for the campaign against France, but it did see action later in the war, during the Siege of Sevastopol, where it proved highly effective with its 800mm (31-inch) shells. During the siege, it destroyed a munitions depot located 30 meters (98 feet) below ground.
Fortunately for the Soviets, Sevastopol was the only instance where they would be on the receiving end of Schwerer Gustav. The gun was moved to Leningrad to take part in the siege there, but the Soviets had already lifted the siege before the gun could fire.
The whole artillery piece weighed 1490 tons and had a length of 47.3 meters (155 ft 2 in). It required a crew of 250 to perform the myriad duties involved in prepping the gun for firing. This involved laying track dedicated to the gun, digging entrenchments, and assembling the gun.
Along with Schwerer Gustav, “Dora,” a second gun was ordered. Traditionally, when artillery was ordered, the Krupp company, which manufactured the gun, never asked for payment for the first piece. As such, Schwerer Gustav was provided to the Wehrmacht for free. Although it looked impressive, this Wunderwaffe did not get to see much action.
5. Panzer VIII Maus
panzer viii maus
The surviving Panzer VIII Maus at the Kubinka Tank Museum in Russia, via tankmuseum.ru
The Maus (Mouse) was anything but little. It was the biggest fully-enclosed armored fighting vehicle ever built. Weighing in at 207 tons and with a length of 33 feet (10.2 meters), the Maus would have certainly been a terrifying sight on the battlefield if it had ever been deployed. Five were ordered, but only two were ever built.
They underwent trials in late 1944, and the 128mm gun was proven to be capable of destroying any and all armored vehicles used by the Allies, with some tests being successful at 3,500 meters (11,500 feet).
This Wunderwaffe, however, had considerable drawbacks. Building an engine powerful enough but small enough to fit in the vehicle was a challenge, and during testing, the fastest speed ever achieved was 14 miles per hour (22 kph). In addition to its slow speed, the vehicle’s weight made it impossible to cross most bridges. As such, the tank was intended to drive through rivers with the aid of a snorkel and was supposedly capable of submerging 26 feet (8 meters).
The war ended before the Maus could ever be put into action. The Russians captured the prototypes and sent them back to Russia for testing. The turret of the second tank was connected to the hull of the first tank. The surviving vehicle is housed in the Kubinka Tank Museum near Moscow.
6. The Horten Ho 229: A Wunderwaffe Far Ahead of Its Time
wunderwaffe horten h 229
A CGI screenshot from “War Thunder” of a Horten Ho 229 in flight, via nationalinterest.com
The project was a response to Hermann Goering’s demand for a light bomber that could carry 1,000 kilograms for 1,000 kilometers at a speed of 100 kilometers per hour. The result was a flying wing design that did more than its creators realized.
Like many other German Wunderwaffe, this machine never made it out of the prototype phase. Only three aircraft were built, but none ever saw action beyond the testing phase.
After the war, tests were done on mock-up versions of the Ho 229, and it was found that the aircraft did, indeed, have a smaller radar cross-section than other conventional aircraft at the time, although not significant. Although tests showed only a moderate improvement in the size of radar cross-section, being 80% of a contemporary prop-driven aircraft, the Horten’s speed, combined with this reduction, would have made it nigh impossible to intercept.
Although Reimar Horten claimed that he had ideas to coat the plane in radar-absorbing dust, his claim came decades after the war, when stealth technology was being understood in the media.
Historians remain skeptical of his claims. Nevertheless, the aircraft did absorb radar waves, serving as a starting point for America’s own stealth program.
The only surviving piece is the third prototype central chassis with engines and cockpit, housed at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington DC.
Perhaps one of the best known of Hitler’s Wunderwaffe was the V-2, a successor to the V-1 and the world’s first long-range guided ballistic missile.
The V-2 was Hitler’s revenge for the Allied bombing of German cities, and they began falling from the skies over Allied cities from September 1944 onwards. Over 3,000 were launched during the course of the war, and over 9,000 civilian targets lost their lives. But its most deadly toll was on the forced laborers. Over 12,000 laborers and concentration camp prisoners died in the production of these weapons.
The guidance system was a particular problem for the Allies, as it used a complex set of gyroscopes that could not be jammed. Initially, the British assumed the guidance system made use of radio, and efforts to jam the weapon proved useless, especially since it descended on its targets at a speed of almost Mach 3.
The V-2 traveled at supersonic speeds, and there was no defense against it. It struck without warning and made no sound before impact. They were launched from mobile platforms that could be well-hidden in wooded areas, making it extremely difficult for Allied bombers to spot and neutralize them.
After the war, the Soviets and the Western Allies raced to retrieve as many V-2s and German scientists as possible. The principal scientist who worked on the program, Wernher von Braun, was captured by the Americans and went on to form the foundation of the first rockets used in America’s space program. The Soviets also used V-2 technology to further their space program. Sputnik was launched into orbit by the world’s first intercontinental ballistic missile, a direct descendant of the V-2 and designed by German scientists working for the Soviets.
8. Landkreuzer P. 1000 “Ratte”: A Wunderwaffe Too Big for the Battlefield
wunderwaffe p 1000 ratte
An artist’s impression of the P. 1000 “Ratte” superheavy tank, via weaponsandwarfare.com
Although it never made it out of the concept stage, it deserves a place as one of Germany’s Wunderwaffe for the sheer audaciousness of its design.
The P. 1000 Ratte was more than a tank. At over 1,000 tons, the vehicle was more of a mobile battle platform than an actual tank. The vehicle was designed to be a platform for two 280mm guns and protected by four 128mm anti-aircraft guns. Between 20 and 41 soldiers would operate the entire machine.
Hitler was enamored with the concept, but Albert Speer, seeing no use for such a ridiculously large tank, canceled the project before any prototype could be built. Of course, this list is only a small portion of the Wunderwaffe employed or imagined by the Nazis. Some designs were outlandishly ridiculous, some were science fiction that would take decades to build, and some were absolutely deadly. If there’s one thing we know for sure, it’s that the cruel and unstoppable Nazis were not lacking in the creativity department.
As Haití Burns, Never Forget: Whites/Arabs Did That
When comparing them side-by-side, the story of the American Revolution ain’t got shit on the history of Haití.
For Afrikan people, Haiti represents the most beautiful story of strength, resistance and freedom that has ever been told. It is the story of a people who thrust off the chains of bondage and took their liberty from the hands of their oppressors.
But when discussing anything having to do with the country of Haiti, we should never forget that every bit of struggle in Haiti is related to the legacy of slavery, capitalism and American hypocrisy.
As unrest envelops Haiti once again, it is important for us to remember that Haiti suffers from a worldwide collusion between America and European countries intent on making the tropical paradise suffer.
To blame Haiti’s problems on white people is not a harebrained hypothesis. It is an unbelievably treacherous fact that it often sounds like a kooky conspiracy theory.
Yes, Haiti is poor. Yes, there is widespread government corruption in the country. But there is also one other unignorable fact:
White people did this.
“In fourteen hundred ninety-two, Columbus sailed the ocean blue.”
Christopher Columbus never set foot on North American soil. While there is some debate about where he first landed in the Caribbean (partly because he was a terrible navigator), we know he arrived on the island of Hispaniola on December 5, 1492.
In A Pest in the Land: New World Epidemics in a Global Perspective, Suzanne Alton writes that most historians estimate the population of the Island of Hispaniola was around 500,000 to one million people when Columbus’ fleet arrived. Columbus immediately took possession of the island, began redirecting the native Taino people’s food and resources to the Europeans, began enslaving the natives and killing the population with disease and brutality that it is described as “surely the greatest tragedy in the history of the human species.”
25 years after Columbus set foot in the place we now call Haiti, less than 14,000 Taino were alive. So the Spanish began importing slaves, believing them to be more sturdy workers. By the time the French took control of 2/3rds of the island and established the colony of French Santo Domingo (or Saint-Domingue), there were zero natives, 25,000 Europeans, 22,000 free coloreds and 700,000 African slaves, according to the 1788 French Census.
The world had changed by then. A revolution was happening in France. North of the island, there was a brand new country called the United States of America. Thomas Paine, an American, had also written a book titled The Rights of Man asserting that freedom was a universal right that all human beings deserved.
Toussaint Louverture, an Afrikan resident of the French colony, inspired by Paine’s book and the stories of the American and French revolutions, led a slave revolt that took control of France’s mostly black, Caribbean paradise.
But France, lusting for a new colony for whites (like the United States) and led by the greatest European warrior in the world, sent an army to capture Louverture and crush the slave rebellion.
The colonizing army was well-trained, more experienced and better-financed than this group of slave rebellers. They figured conquering the rebellion would be light work.
The slaves kicked Napolean Bonaparte’s ass.
Gen. Jean-Jacques Dessalines proclaimed victory and ordered the slaves to destroy any Frenchman who remained on the island, announcing: “We have repaid these cannibals, war for war, crime for crime, outrage for outrage.”
The citizens of the newly freed country would forever remember the history of their brutal oppression at the hands of Europeans. They even tossed the Spanish and French names for their country and renamed it in the language of the now-extinct Taino people. Since that day, a white man has never ruled the place we now call “Haiti.”
America hates Haiti.
White people around the globe hate Haiti.
To be fair, not all white people think of Haiti as a “shithole country.” Polish soldiers who went to fight against the uprising in Haiti refused to lay a hand on Haiti’s black slave rebellers. When the revolutionaries destroyed the white colonizers, they spared the Polish inhabitants on the island.
The reason Haiti is impoverished is mostly America and France’s fault. They did this while the rest of the European powers watched quietly. So no, not all white people destroyed Haiti. Just some white people.
Mostly America.
Which is enough.
Understanding what America and France, two of the most powerful countries in the world, did to Haiti requires a suspension of disbelief because it is so insane that it sounds like fiction. But it is a historical fact that France’s and the United States’ approach to Haiti would devastate the Haitian economy, thrusting Haiti into a poverty that would last to this very day.
Haiti is poor because America and France instituted the most racist economic foreign policy that ever existed.
Not even two decades after Haiti gained its independence, France demanded that Haiti compensate former French slaveowners for the value of all those slaves who set themselves free. Yes, France and the land of the free, home of the brave, essentially demanded reverse slave reparations.
In 1825, France sent warships to Haiti and demanded 150 million Francs. Not only did the United States agree, but they backed up France’s demands for the debt on the international stage, imploring European countries to ignore Haiti’s existence until it paid this money.
A Historical Account of the Black Empire of Hayti
Contents.
A SUCCINCT historical View of the Colonies of Hispaniola and St. Domingo,
from the Discovery of Hayti, by Columbus, to the Height of their
Prosperity in 1789 15–69
Origin of the Revolutionary Spirit of this Period in
St. Domingo 69–77
Account of the Progress and Accomplishment of the Independence
of St. Domingo 77–132
State of Manners on the Independence of the Blacks in St. Domingo,
with a Memoir of the Circumstances of the Author’s Visit to
the Island in 1799 132–148
View of the Black Army, and of the War between the French Republic and
the independent Blacks of St. Domingo 148–216
On the Establishment of a Black Empire, and the probable Effects of
the Colonial Revolution 216–218
Blake—and his wife Cotto. They are buried in the cemetery of Shepperton, near
Walton-on-Thames, Middlesex, England. The entire epitaph is quoted in the Gentle-
Bibliography
Account Book of the Deputy Paymaster General, Hispaniola, 1796–77. National Library of Jamaica, Kingston.
Adanson, Michel. Histoire naturelle du Sénégal. Coquillages. Avec la relation abrégée d’uvoyage fait en ce pays pendant les années 1749, 50, 51, 52 et 53. Paris: Bauche, 1757.
Almanack and Register for the Island of Jamaica. Kingston, 1782.
Alumni Dublinesis: A Register of the Students, Graduates, Professors, and Provosts of Trinity
College in the University of Dublin. Dublin: A. Thom, 1935.
Anderson, Adam. An historical and chronological deduction of the origin of commerce
from the earliest accounts to the present time, containing an history of the great com-
mercial interests of the British empire. London: Millar, 1764.
Anderson, James. A Few Facts and Observations on the Yellow Fever of the West Indies.
Manchester: Harrop, 1799.
The Annual Register. London, 1791–1804.
The Annual Review; and History of Literature. London: Longman and Rees, 1803.
The Anti- Jacobin Review and Political Magazine. London, 1806.
Archenholz, Johann Wilhelm von. Geschichte der Flibustier. Tübingen, 1803.
———, ed. Minerva. Jena, 1802, 1806.
Ardouin, Beaubrun. Etudes sur l’histoire d’Haïti. 11 vols. Paris: Dézobry et Magdeleine,
1853–60.
Barbot, Jean. A Description of the Coasts of North and South Guinea and of Ethiopia In-
ferior, vulgarly Angola. In Collection of Voyages and Travels, ed. Thomas Astley and
J. Churchill. 5 vols. London, 1732.
Barthelemy, Anthony Gerard. Black Face, Maligned Race: The Representation of Blacks
in English Drama from Shakespeare to Southerne. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Uni-
versity Press, 1987.
Beard, John Relly. Toussaint L’Ouverture: A Biography and Autobiography. Boston: James
Redpath, 1863.
Bell, Madison Smartt. Toussaint Louverture: A Biography. New York: Pantheon, 2007.
Benezet, Anthony. Some historical account of Guinea, its situation, produce, and the gen-
eral disposition of its inhabitants. 1771. London: Owen, 1772.
Benzoni, Girolamo. Historia del Mondo Nuovo. Venice, 1565.
Bercy, Drouin de. De Saint-Domingue: de ses guerres, de ses révolutions, de ses ressources,
et des moyens à prendre pour y rétablir la paix et l’industrie. Paris: Hocquet, 1814.
Bernheim, Alain. “Le ‘Bicentenaire’ des Grandes Constitutions de 1786: Essai sur les
cinq textes de référence historique du Rite Écossais Ancien et Accepté,” part I,
Renaissance Traditionnelle 68 (1986): 241–63; part II, Renaissance Traditionnelle 69
(1987): 29–80; part III, Renaissance Traditionnelle 70 (1987): 99–138.
Bibliographie de la France: ou Journal général de l’imprimerie et de la librairie. Paris, 1829.
bibliogrAPhY 323
Charmilly, P. F. Venault de. Lettre à M. Bryan Edwards, en Réfutation de son Ouvrage in-
titulé Vues Historiques sur La Colonie Française de St. Domingue, &c. London, 1797.
Chartrand, René, and Francis Back. Napoleon’s Overseas Army. London: Osprey, 1989.
Chartrand, René, and Paul Chappell. British Forces in the West Indies, 1793–1815. Lon-
don: Osprey, 1996.
Chateaubriand, François-René de. Mémoires d’Outre-Tombe. 42 vols. Paris, 1849–50.
[Chesterfield, Philip Dormer Stanhope, Lord]. Preface. Love Elegies by James Ham-
mond. Dublin: J. Potts and S. Watson, 1742. iii–iv.
Clark, James. A Treatise on the Yellow Fever as it Appeared in the Island of Dominica in the
Years 1793–4–5–6. London: J. Murray and S. Highley, 1797.
Clark, Murtie June. Loyalists in the Southern Campaign of the Revolutionary War. Balti-
more: Genealogical Publishing, 1981.
Clavin, Matthew. “Race, Rebellion, and the Gothic: Inventing the Haitian Revolu-
tion.” Early American Studies 5.1 (2007): 1–29.
———. Toussaint Louverture and the American Civil War: The Promise and Peril of a
Second Haitian Revolution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.
Cobbett’s Weekly Political Register. London, 1802–4.
Colquhoun, Patrick. Treatise on the Police of the Metropolis. London: H. Fry, 1796.
Cook, James. A Voyage to the Pacific Ocean. 3 vols. London: Strahan, 1784.
Coulon, Jean Philippe Garran de. Rapport sur les Troubles de Saint- Domingue. 4 vols.
Paris: 1797–99.
Crissé, Lancelot Turpin de. Commentaires de César, avec notes historiques, critiques et
militaires. 3 vols. Paris, 1785.
The Critical Review; Or, Annals of Literature. London: J. Mawman, 1801, 1806.
Curran, Stuart. Poetic Form and British Romanticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1986.
Daguillard, Fritz. Enigmatic in His Glory: Toussaint Louverture (1743–1803). Port-au-
Prince: Musée du Panthéon Nationale Haïtien, 2003.
Dallas, R. C. The History of the Maroons, from their Origin to the Establishment of their
Chief Tribe at Sierra Leone. 2 vols. London: Longman and Rees, 1803.
Décret de l’Assemblée Générale de Saint-Domingue, rendu le 28 mai 1790, à l’unanimité; et
développement de ce décret par l’assemblée aux observations sur ce décret par l’assem-
blée provinciale du Nord, en date de 1er juin. Paris, 1790.
Desclaisons, M. Précis des histoires d’Alexandre le Grand et de Jules César, et de leurs faits
militaires, soit comparés soit opposés entre eux; suivi de différents points de comparai-
son ou opposition entre ces deux généraux. 2 vols. Paris, 1784.
Doyle, Arthur. A Hundred Years of Conflict: Being some Records of the Services of Six Gen-
erals of the Doyle Family, 1756–1856. London: Longmans, Green, 1911.
Dubois, Laurent. Avengers of the New World: The Story of the Haitian Revolution. Cam-
bridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
Dubroca, [Jean-Louis]. The Life of Toussaint Louverture, Chief of the French Rebels in St.
Domingo. Translated from the French. London: H. D. Symonds, 1802.
Duffy, Michael. Soldiers, Sugar, and Seapower: The British Expeditions to the West Indies
and the War against Revolutionary France. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.
Dunn, Richard S. Sugar and Slaves: the Rise of the Planter Class in the British West Indies,
324 bibliogrAPhY
1624–1713. 2d ed. Chapel Hill: Omohundro Institute of Early American History and
Culture and University of North Carolina Press, 2000.
Du Tertre [Jean-Baptiste]. Histoire générale des Antilles habitées par les François. 4 vols.
Paris: Thomas Iolly, 1667–71.
Echard, Laurence. The History of the Revolution and the Establishment of England in the
Year 1688. London: Hyde and Dobson, 1725.
The Eclectic Review. London: C. Taylor, 1806.
The Edinburgh Review. Edinburgh, 1806.
Edwards, Bryan. An Historical Survey of the French Colony in the Island of St. Domingo.
London: Stockdale, 1797.
———. The History, Civil and Commercial, of the British Colonies in the West Indies. 3d
ed. 3 vols. London: Stockdale, 1801.
Emerson, William K. Chevrons: Catalog of U.S. Army Insignia. Washington: Smithsonian
Institution Press, 1983.
Estimates and Accounts: Army; Navy; Ordnance; Civil List; Miscellaneous Services. Vol.
13. London, 1818.
An Exhibition of miniatures owned in South Carolina and miniatures of South Carolinians
owned elsewhere painted before the year 1860. Charleston: Carolina Art Association,
Gibbes Memorial Art Gallery, 1936.
Fick, Carolyn E. The Making of Haiti: The Saint Domingue Revolution from Below. Knox-
ville: University of Tennessee Press, 1990.
Fischer, Sibylle. Modernity Disavowed: Haiti and the Cultures of Slavery in the Age of
Revolution. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.
Fortescue, J. W. A History of the British Army. 4 vols. London: Macmillan, 1910–30.
Fouchard, Jean. Le Théâtre à Saint-Domingue. Port au Prince: Editions Henri Des-
champs, 1988.
Friday’s Post Ipswich Journal. London, 1802.
Gazette Nationale, ou Le Moniteur Universel. Paris, 1791–1805.
Gazette Officielle de Saint-Domingue. Port-au-Prince.
Gazzetta di Milano. Milan, June 26, 1816.
Geggus, David Patrick. “The Arming of Slaves in the Haitian Revolution.” In Arming
Slaves: From Classical Times to the Modern Age, ed. Christopher Leslie Brown and
Philip D. Morgan. New Haven: Yale University Press. 209–32.
———. “British Opinion and the Emergence of Haiti, 1791–1805.” In Slavery and
British Society 1776–1846, ed. James Walvin. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State
University Press. 123–49.
———. “The Cost of Pitt’s Caribbean Campaigns, 1793–1798.” Historical Journal 26.3
(1983): 699–706.
———. “The Great Powers and the Haitian Revolution.” In Haitian Revolutionary
Studies, 171–78.
———. Haitian Revolutionary Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002.
———. Slavery, War, and Revolution: The British Occupation of Saint Domingue, 1793–
1798. Oxford: Clarendon, 1982.
———. “Slave, Soldier, Rebel: The Strange Career of Jean Kina.” In Haitian Revolu-
tionary Studies, 137–51.
bibliogrAPhY 325
———. “The ‘Volte-Face’ of Toussaint Louverture.” In Haitian Revolutionary Studies,
119–36.
The Gentleman’s Magazine. London: Nichols and Son, 1806.
Goldsmith, Oliver. “The Traveler.” In The Poetical Works of Dr. Goldsmith. London:
Osborne and Griffin, 1785.
Gómara, Francisco López de. La Historia general de las Indias. Saragossa, 1552.
Göttlingische gelehrte Anzeigen. Göttingen, 1802.
Gray, Thomas. “Ode on the Spring.” In The Poetical Works of Thomas Gray, LL. B. Lon-
don: Scatcherd, 1799.
Grégoire [Henri]. Lettre aux citoyens de couleur et nègres libres de Saint-Domingue, et
autres isles françoises de l’Amérique. Paris: imprimerie du patriote français, 1791.
———. De la littérature des nègres, ou Recherches sur leurs facultés intellectuelles, leurs
qualités morales et leur littérature. Paris, 1808.
Guichard, Karl Gottlieb. Mémoires militaires sur les Grecs et les Romains. The Hague,
1757.
Hakluyt, Richard. Diverse Voyages Touching the Discoverie of America. London, 1582.
Hayley, William. An Essay on Epic Poetry: in five Epistles to the Revd. Mr. Mason. Lon-
don: J. Dodsley, 1782.
———. The Life of Milton, in three parts. 2d ed. London: Cadell and Davies, 1796.
[Henry I of Haiti]. Manifeste du Roi. Cap Henry: P. Roux, 1814.
Herodotus. The Landmark Herodotus. Robert B. Strassler, ed. Andrea L. Purvis, trans.
New York: Pantheon, 2007.
Herrera y Tordesillas, Antonio de. Historia general de los hechos de los Castellanos en las
islas y tierra firme del Mar Oceano. 1601–15.
Histoire Générale des Voyages. 15 vols. Paris: Didot, 1697–1763.
Howard, Thomas Phipps. The Haitian Journal of Lieutenant Howard, York Hussars, 1796–
1798. Roger Norman Buckley, ed. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1985.
Hughes, Derek, ed. Versions of Blackness: Key Texts on Blackness from the Seventeenth
Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Hume, David. A History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in
1688. 6 vols. London: T. Cadell, 1762.
An Inquiry into the Causes of the Insurrection of the Negroes in St. Domingo, to which are
added Observations of M. Garran-Coulon on the Same Subject. London: J. Johnson,
1792.
James, C. L. R. The Black Jacobins. 2d ed. New York: Vintage, 1989.
Kay, John. A Series of Original Portraits and Caricature Etchings. With Biographical
Sketches and Illustrative Anecdotes. Edinburgh: A & C Black, 1877.
Labat, Jean-Baptiste. Nouveau voyage aux isles de l’Amérique. 6 vols. Paris, 1722.
Lacroix, Pamphile de. Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire de la révolution de Saint-
Domingue. 2 vols. Paris: Pillet Aîné, 1819.
Larwood, Joshua. Erratics: by a sailor; containing rambles in Norfolk, and elsewhere.
2 vols. London, 1800.
Las Casas, Bartolomé de. A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies, 1552.
Las Cases, Emmanuel-Auguste- Dieudonné de. The Life, Exile, and Conversations of the
Emperor Napoleon. 2 vols. London: Henry Colburn, 1835.
326 bibliogrAPhY
Laurie, William Alexander. The History of Free Masonry and the Grand Lodge of Scotland.
Edinburgh: Seton and Mackenzie, 1859.
Le Beau, Charles. Histoire de l’Académie royale des inscriptions et belles-lettres, avec les
mémoires de littérature. Vols. 25–39. Paris, 1759–77.
Ledyard, John. “Eulogium.” Proceedings of the Association for Promoting the Discovery of
the Interior Parts of Africa, 1788–1790. London: T. Cadell, 1791.
———. A Journal of Captain Cook’s Last Voyage to the Pacific Ocean. London, 1783.
Leslie, Charles. A New History of Jamaica. London: J. Hodges, 1740.
[Lloyd, Henry]. The History of the Late War in Germany; Between the King of Prussia, and
the Empress of Germany and her Allies. London, 1766.
The London Gazette. London, 1813.
London Metropolitan Archives. Saint Giles in the Fields: Saint Giles High Street, Hol-
born, Camden. Transcript of Burials, January–December 1817. dl/t Item 036/029,
dl/t/036/029.
Long, Edward. The History of Jamaica; Or, General Survey of the Antient and Modern State
of that Island. 3 vols. London: T. Lowndes, 1774.
Madiou, Thomas, fils. Histoire d’Haïti, 8 vols. Port-au- Prince: Courtois, 1848.
Malenfant, Colonel. Des colonies, et particulièrement de celle de Saint-Domingue: Mé-
moire historique et politique. Paris: Audibert, 1814.
Malouet, Victor Pierre. Collection de mémoires et correspondances officielles sur l’ad-
ministration des colonies et notamment sur la Guiane française et hollandaise. 5 vols.
Paris, 1802.
[Malthus, Thomas]. An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: J. Johnson, 1798.
Martyr, Peter (Martire d’Anghiera, Pietro). De Orbe Novo, 1530.
Métral, Antoine, and Isaac Louverture. Histoire de l’expédition des français à Saint-
Domingue sous le consulat de Napoléon Bonaparte; suivie des Mémoires et Notes
d’Isaac Louverture. Paris: Fanjat Aîné, 1825.
Mintz, Sidney Wilfred. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New
York: Viking, 1985.
The Monthly Mirror: Reflecting Men and Manners. London, 1802.
The Monthly Review; Or, Literary Journal. London, 1801.
Moseley, Benjamin. Medical Tracts. 2d ed. London: T. Cadell, Jr., and W. Davies, 1800.
———. A Treatise on Sugar. London: C. G. and J. Robinson, 1800.
The New Annual Register; Or, General Repository of History, Politics, and Literature. Lon-
don: Stockdale, 1806.
Nussbaum, Felicity. The Limits of the Human: Fictions of Anomaly, Race, and Gender in
the Long Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[Ogden, James]. The Revolution: An Epic Poem, in Twelve Books. London: J. Johnson,
1790.
Orléans, Pierre Joseph d’. Histoire des révolutions d’Angleterre depuis le commencement
de la monarchie. Paris, 1689.
———. Histoire des révolutions d’Espagne, depuis la destruction de l’empire des Goths,
jusqu’à l’entière et parfaite réunion des royaumes de Castille et d’Aragon en une seule
monarchie. 3 vols. Paris, 1734.
Oviedo [Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo y Valdés]. La historia general y natural de las
Indias. Toledo, 1526–35.
bibliogrAPhY 327
Pachonski, Jan, and Reuel K. Wilson. Poland’s Caribbean Tragedy: A Study of Polish
Legions in the Haitian War of Independence 1802–1803. Boulder: East European
Monographs, 1986.
Paquin, Lyonel. The Haitians: Class and Color Politics. Brooklyn, NY: Multi-Type, 1983.
A Particular Account of the Commencement and Progress of the Insurrection of the Negroes
in St. Domingo, which began in August 1791. 2d ed. London: J. Sewell, 1792.
Piecuch, Jim. Loyalists, Indians, and Slaves in the Revolutionary South, 1775–1782.
Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2008.
Pierrot, Grégory. “‘Our Hero’: Toussaint Louverture in British Representations.” Criti-
cism 50.4 (2008): 581–607.
Pincus, Steve. 1688: The First Modern Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press,
2009.
Pluchon, Pierre. Toussaint Louverture: un révolutionnaire noir de l’Ancien Régime. Paris:
Fayard, 1989.
Pocock, Michael Rogers. Out of the Shadows of the Past: The Story of the Great House of
Champs Elysées, Maraval, and an Account of the Families who lived in it, 1780–1932.
Port of Spain: Paria Publishing, 1993.
Pope, Alexander. An Essay on Man. In Epistles to a Friend. Epistle I. London: 1733.
———. “Prologue.” In Cato, by Joseph Addison. 1713. London: Longman, Lowndes,
Bladon, Cadell et al. 1795.
———. “Sappho to Phaon: From the Fifteenth of Ovid’s Epistles.” In The Major
Works, by Alexander Pope. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Postlethwayt, Malachy. The Universal Dictionary of Trade and Commerce. London:
J. Knapton, 1757.
Pulis, John W. “Bridging Troubled Waters: Moses Baker, George Liele, and the African
American Diaspora to Jamaica.” In Moving On: Black Loyalists in the Afro-Atlantic
World, ed. John W. Pulis. New York: Garland, 1999. 183–222.
Rainsford, Captain [Marcus]. A Memoir of Transactions That Took Place in St. Domingo
in the Spring of 1799. London: R. B. Scott, 1802.
Rainsford, Marcus. Geschichte der Insel Hayti: Oder, St. Domingo besonders des auf der-
selben errichteten Negerreichs. Trans. Doctor Levi and Posstefretär Roch. Hamburg:
A. Schmidt, 1806.
———. An Historical Account of the Black Empire of Hayti: Comprehending a View of the
Principal Transactions in the Revolution of Saint Domingo; with its Antient and Modern
State. London: Cundee, 1805.
———. St. Domingo, of het land der Zwarten in Hayti en deszelfs Omwenteling. 2 vols.
Amsterdam: Johannes Allart, 1806.
———. St. Domingo; Or, an Historical, Political and Military Sketch of the Black Repub-
lic. 2d ed. London: R. B. Scott, 1802.
———. St. Domingo; Or, an Historical, Political and Military Sketch of the Projected
Black Republic. 3d ed. London: R. B. Scott, 1802.
———. Translation of an Official Communication from the Government of Hayti. Bristol:
John Evans, 1816.
[Rainsford, Marcus]. An Hymeneal on the Marriage of the Right Hon. Francis, Earl of
Moira, etc. etc. etc., to the Right Hon. Flora, Countess of Loudon; on the 12th Day of July,
1804. London: Isaac Bisset, 1804.
328 bibliogrAPhY
———. The Revolution; Or, Britain Delivered: A Poem in Twelve Cantos, with Notes His-
torical and Explanatory. Edinburgh: Creech; and London: Cadell, 1791.
———. The Revolution; Or, Britain Delivered: A Poem in Ten Cantos. 2d ed. London:
R. B. Scott, 1800.
Raynal, Guillaume Thomas François. A Philosophical and Political History of the Settle-
ments and Trade of the Europeans in the East and West Indies. Trans. J. Justamond.
5 vols. 2d ed. London: T. Cadell, 1776.
Robertson, William. The History of America. 3 vols. 6th ed. London: Strahan and
Cadell, 1792.
Roussier, Michel. “L’éducation des enfants de Toussaint Louverture et l’Institution
nationale des colonies.” In Toussaint Louverture et l’indépendance d’Haïti: Témoig-
nages pour un bicentenaire, ed. Jacques de Cauna. Paris: Editions Karthala, 2004.
Saint-Rémy, Joseph. Mémoires du Général Toussaint-L’Ouverture, écrits par lui-même,
pouvant servir à l’histoire de sa vie. Paris: Pagnerre, 1853.
———. Vie de Toussaint-L’Ouverture. Paris: Moquet, 1850.
Saxe, Maurice de. Mes Rêveries. Paris, 1757.
Scott, David. Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment. Durham:
Duke University Press, 2004.
Shakespeare, William. Complete Works. New York: Modern Library, 2007.
Slatta, Richard W., and Jane Lucas de Grummond. Simon Bolivar’s Quest for Glory. Col-
lege Station: Texas A&m University Press, 2003.
Sloane, Hans. A Voyage to the Islands Madera, Barbados, Nieves, S. Christophers and
Jamaica, with the Natural History of the Herbs and Trees, Four-footed Beasts, Fishes,
Birds, Insects, Reptiles, &c. Of the last of those islands. 2 vols. London, 1707–25.
Smith, William. A New Voyage to Guinea. London, 1744.
Stephen, James. The Crisis in the Sugar Colonies. London, 1802.
[Stephen, James]. Buonaparte in the West Indies; or, the History of Toussaint Louverture,
the African Hero. London: J. Hatchard, 1803.
———. The Opportunity; Or, Reasons for an Immediate Alliance with St. Domingo. Lon-
don: Hatchard, 1804.
The Times of London. London, 1790–1820.
Tomlinson, Robert. An Attempt to rescue the Holy Scriptures from the Ridicule they incur,
with the Inconsiderate, occasioned by Incorrect Translation. London: Baynes, 1804.
Trouillot, Hénock. Le gouvernement du roi Henri Christophe. Port-au-Prince: Impri-
merie Centrale, 1972.
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Bos-
ton: Beacon, 1997.
Tyson, George F. Toussaint L’Ouverture. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1973.
Tytler, James. A Treatise on the Plague and Yellow Fever. Salem, Mass.: Joshua Cushing
for B. B. Macanulty, 1799.
United Kingdom. The National Archives. Admiralty and Secretariat Papers.
———. Records of the Colonial Office.
———. Records of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury.
———. Records of the War Office.
Vegetius, Flavius. Vegetius: Epitome of Military Science. N. P. Milner, ed. 2d rev. ed.
Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1996.
https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/30266/648151.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y